vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of REPLIGEN CORP (RGEN) and LendingTree, Inc. (TREE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LendingTree, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($327.3M vs $194.3M, roughly 1.7× REPLIGEN CORP). LendingTree, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs 4.3%, a 1.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, REPLIGEN CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.8% vs 2.4%). Over the past eight quarters, LendingTree, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (24.8% CAGR vs 12.3%).
Repligen Corporation is a global life sciences company devoted to the development and commercialization of innovative bioprocessing technologies and systems that enable efficiencies in the process of manufacturing biological drugs.2025 The company is based in Waltham, Massachusetts,2014 and was incorporated in Delaware in 1981. A public company, Repligen is listed on the NASDAQ exchange under the symbol RGEN. As of 2025, Repligen employs over 1,900 employees globally and serves primarily biop...
LendingTree, Inc. is an online lending marketplace, founded in 1996 and headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina. The business platform allows potential borrowers to connect with multiple loan operators to find optimal terms for loans, credit cards, deposit accounts, insurance, etc. LendingTree allows borrowers to shop and compare competitive rates and terms across an array of financial products. Other additional services include financing tools, comparative loan searches and borrowing info...
RGEN vs TREE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $194.3M | $327.3M |
| Net Profit | $8.3M | $17.3M |
| Gross Margin | 55.7% | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.2% | 9.5% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 5.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.8% | 2.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 42.9% | 239.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.15 | $1.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $194.3M | $327.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $197.9M | $319.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $188.8M | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $182.4M | $250.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $169.2M | $239.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $174.1M | $261.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $154.9M | $260.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $154.1M | $210.1M |
| Q1 26 | $8.3M | $17.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | $144.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.9M | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.9M | $8.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.8M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.3M | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-654.0K | $-58.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | $7.8M |
| Q1 26 | 55.7% | 100.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 52.5% | 29.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.2% | 30.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.0% | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.6% | 32.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.1% | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.0% | 30.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.8% | 34.5% |
| Q1 26 | 8.2% | 9.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.0% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.9% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.7% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | 4.6% |
| Q1 26 | 4.3% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | -5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.4% | -22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 3.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.15 | $1.22 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.24 | $10.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.26 | $0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.26 | $0.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.10 | $-0.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.55 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.01 | $-4.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.06 | $0.58 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $582.6M | $85.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $390.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $304.7M |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $863.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $582.6M | $85.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $767.6M | $81.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $748.7M | $68.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $708.9M | $149.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $697.2M | $126.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $757.4M | $106.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $784.0M | $96.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $809.1M | $66.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $390.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $542.2M | $387.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $537.9M | $388.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $385.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $387.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $525.6M | $344.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $346.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $467.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $304.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $286.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $132.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $118.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $103.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $108.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $94.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $145.8M |
| Q1 26 | $2.9B | $863.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $855.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $759.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $835.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $777.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $767.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $787.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $802.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.26× | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.26× | 2.93× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.27× | 3.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RGEN
| Product | $194.2M | 100% |
| Royalty and other revenue | $44.0K | 0% |
TREE
| Insurance segment | $221.9M | 68% |
| Consumer segment | $66.3M | 20% |
| Home segment | $39.1M | 12% |