vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of RIO TINTO PLC (RIO) and United Parcel Service (UPS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RIO TINTO PLC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($30.8B vs $21.2B, roughly 1.5× United Parcel Service). RIO TINTO PLC runs the higher net margin — 18.6% vs 4.1%, a 14.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RIO TINTO PLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.6% vs -1.6%). RIO TINTO PLC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.3B vs $1.3B).
Rio Tinto Group is a British-Australian multinational mining company headquartered in London, England, and Melbourne, Australia. It was founded in 1873 when a group of British investors purchased a mine complex on the Río Tinto, in Huelva, Spain, from the Spanish government. It has grown through a long series of mergers and acquisitions and is today a major producer of commodities such as copper, iron ore, aluminium and lithium.
United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) is an American multinational shipping & receiving and supply chain management company founded in 1907. Originally known as the American Messenger Company specializing in telegraphs, UPS has expanded to become a Fortune 500 company and one of the world's largest shipping couriers. UPS today is primarily known for its ground shipping services as well as the UPS Store, a retail chain which assists UPS shipments and provides tools for small businesses.
RIO vs UPS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.8B | $21.2B |
| Net Profit | $5.7B | $864.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 25.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 18.6% | 4.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.6% | -1.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 0.5% | -27.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.32 | $1.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $21.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $30.8B | $24.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $21.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $21.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.9B | $25.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $864.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.9% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.5% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.2% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.02 | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.32 | $2.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.55 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.51 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.40 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.51 | $2.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.80 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $9.4B | $5.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $21.9B | $23.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $67.0B | — |
| Total Assets | $128.1B | $71.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.4B | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $23.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.9B | $23.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $23.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.4B | $19.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $20.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $67.0B | $16.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.0B | $16.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $71.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $128.1B | $73.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $71.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $70.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $68.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.8B | $70.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $68.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $69.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | 1.45× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.21× | 1.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.9B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.3B | $1.3B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.5% | 6.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 24.7% | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.73× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $11.4B | $4.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.9B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $348.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-775.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $655.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.73× | 1.84× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.89× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.95× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.50× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RIO
Segment breakdown not available.
UPS
| U.S. Domestic Package | $14.1B | 67% |
| International Package | $4.5B | 21% |
| Supply Chain Solutions | $2.5B | 12% |
