vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM) and SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc (SSNC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $828.2M, roughly 2.0× Rithm Capital Corp.). SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc runs the higher net margin — 13.7% vs 13.2%, a 0.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Rithm Capital Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (508.5% vs 8.8%). Over the past eight quarters, SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc's revenue compounded faster (6.5% CAGR vs -17.9%).
Rithm Capital Corp. (Rithm) is an American investment management company headquartered in New York that focuses on real estate and alternative investments.
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. is an American multinational holding company headquartered in Windsor, Connecticut, that sells software and software as a service to the financial services industry. The company has offices in the Americas, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia.
RITM vs SSNC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $828.2M | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | $109.5M | $226.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 48.7% |
| Operating Margin | 29.9% | 24.2% |
| Net Margin | 13.2% | 13.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 508.5% | 8.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 27.7% | 6.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.12 | $0.91 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $828.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $768.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $619.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $109.5M | $226.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $85.0M | $193.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $221.5M | $210.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.7M | $180.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.8M | $213.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $290.2M | $248.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.7M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $235.6M | $190.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 47.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 47.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 49.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 49.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 48.1% |
| Q1 26 | 29.9% | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.8% | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.4% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.2% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.4% | 23.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.8% | 23.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.6% | 22.6% |
| Q1 26 | 13.2% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.0% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.6% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.3% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.0% | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 13.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.12 | $0.91 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.09 | $0.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.35 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.53 | $0.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.07 | $0.84 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | $0.98 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $0.65 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.43 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $420.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $7.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.1B | $6.9B |
| Total Assets | $53.4B | $20.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $420.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $462.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $388.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $480.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $515.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $567.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $694.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $462.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $35.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $9.1B | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.4B | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.7B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3B | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | $53.4B | $20.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $53.1B | $20.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.2B | $19.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.3B | $19.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.3B | $20.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.0B | $19.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.3B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.0B | $16.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.20× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.79× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.92× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.14× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.18× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.87× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.10× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $299.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $299.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-114.6M | $643.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.0B | $456.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-557.1M | $372.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $272.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.8B | $486.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $768.1M | $336.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-55.7M | $384.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $633.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $421.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $350.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $259.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $466.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $310.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $374.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.35× | 3.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.22× | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.79× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.03× | 1.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.04× | 1.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.31× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.24× | 2.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RITM
| Servicing revenue, net | $375.1M | 45% |
| Other | $234.9M | 28% |
| Gain on originated residential mortgage loans, held-for-sale, net | $195.0M | 24% |
| Other revenue | $23.3M | 3% |
SSNC
| Technology-enabled services | $1.4B | 85% |
| License, maintenance and related | $239.8M | 15% |