vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC (RLGT) and Vroom, Inc. (VRM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Vroom, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($235.9M vs $232.1M, roughly 1.0× RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC). RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC runs the higher net margin — 2.3% vs -59.8%, a 62.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vroom, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.9% vs -12.3%). RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($11.6M vs $-108.8M). Over the past eight quarters, RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (12.1% CAGR vs -49.5%).
Radiant Logistics, Inc. is a leading third-party logistics provider offering end-to-end supply chain solutions, domestic and international freight forwarding, warehousing, and last-mile delivery services. It primarily serves North American markets, with key client segments including retail, manufacturing, e-commerce, and industrial sectors, helping businesses optimize logistics workflows and cut operational costs.
Vroom, Inc. is a parent company of United Auto Credit Corporation (UACC) and CarStory. Previously, Vroom was a used car retailer and e-commerce company that let consumers buy, sell, and finance cars online. Vroom ceased e-commerce automotive sales operations on January 22, 2024.
RLGT vs VRM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2023
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $232.1M | $235.9M |
| Net Profit | $5.3M | $-141.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 12.3% |
| Operating Margin | 3.2% | -11.5% |
| Net Margin | 2.3% | -59.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -12.3% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.0% | -669.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $-80.66 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $232.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $226.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $220.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $264.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $203.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $184.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-703.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.02 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.9M | $135.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $454.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $229.8M | $127.7M |
| Total Assets | $439.4M | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.56× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $229.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $225.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $218.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $214.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $212.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $209.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $206.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $439.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $426.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $414.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $386.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $375.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $371.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $364.0M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $12.4M | $-108.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $11.6M | $-108.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.0% | -46.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.33× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $8.5M | $-536.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $12.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $205.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $11.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $977.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-185.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.90× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.26× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.43× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RLGT
| Transferred Over Time | $201.2M | 87% |
| Other | $25.0M | 11% |
| Value Added Services | $4.2M | 2% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.8M | 1% |
VRM
Segment breakdown not available.
