vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Regional Management Corp. (RM) and Solo Brands, Inc. (SBDS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Regional Management Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($167.3M vs $94.0M, roughly 1.8× Solo Brands, Inc.). Regional Management Corp. runs the higher net margin — 6.8% vs -88.4%, a 95.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Regional Management Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.4% vs -34.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Regional Management Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (8.2% CAGR vs 5.0%).

Millennium Management LLC is an investment management firm with a multistrategy hedge fund offering. It is one of the world's largest alternative asset management firms with $83.4 billion assets under management as of January 2026. The firm operates in America, Europe and Asia. As of 2022, Millennium had posted the fourth highest net gains of any hedge fund since its inception in 1989.

Conagra Brands, Inc. is an American consumer packaged goods holding company that makes and sells products under various brand names that are available in supermarkets, restaurants, and food service establishments. Based on its 2021 revenue, the company ranked 331st on the 2022 Fortune 500. Headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, Conagra was founded in Nebraska in 1919 and was originally called Nebraska Consolidated Mills.

RM vs SBDS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
RM
RM
1.8× larger
RM
$167.3M
$94.0M
SBDS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
RM
RM
+43.9% gap
RM
9.4%
-34.5%
SBDS
Higher net margin
RM
RM
95.3% more per $
RM
6.8%
-88.4%
SBDS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
RM
RM
Annualised
RM
8.2%
5.0%
SBDS

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
RM
RM
SBDS
SBDS
Revenue
$167.3M
$94.0M
Net Profit
$11.4M
$-83.2M
Gross Margin
60.6%
Operating Margin
-81.7%
Net Margin
6.8%
-88.4%
Revenue YoY
9.4%
-34.5%
Net Profit YoY
62.7%
-42.9%
EPS (diluted)
$1.18
$-45.73

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
RM
RM
SBDS
SBDS
Q1 26
$167.3M
Q4 25
$169.7M
$94.0M
Q3 25
$165.5M
$53.0M
Q2 25
$157.4M
$92.3M
Q1 25
$153.0M
$77.3M
Q4 24
$154.8M
$143.5M
Q3 24
$146.3M
$94.1M
Q2 24
$143.0M
$131.6M
Net Profit
RM
RM
SBDS
SBDS
Q1 26
$11.4M
Q4 25
$12.9M
$-83.2M
Q3 25
$14.4M
$-22.9M
Q2 25
$10.1M
$-20.8M
Q1 25
$7.0M
$-18.6M
Q4 24
$9.9M
$-58.2M
Q3 24
$7.7M
$-111.5M
Q2 24
$8.4M
$-4.0M
Gross Margin
RM
RM
SBDS
SBDS
Q1 26
Q4 25
60.6%
Q3 25
60.0%
Q2 25
61.3%
Q1 25
55.2%
Q4 24
61.1%
Q3 24
41.8%
Q2 24
62.8%
Operating Margin
RM
RM
SBDS
SBDS
Q1 26
Q4 25
9.5%
-81.7%
Q3 25
11.5%
-30.5%
Q2 25
8.6%
-10.7%
Q1 25
6.0%
-13.8%
Q4 24
8.2%
-38.5%
Q3 24
6.9%
-122.5%
Q2 24
7.8%
1.7%
Net Margin
RM
RM
SBDS
SBDS
Q1 26
6.8%
Q4 25
7.6%
-88.4%
Q3 25
8.7%
-43.2%
Q2 25
6.4%
-22.5%
Q1 25
4.6%
-24.0%
Q4 24
6.4%
-40.6%
Q3 24
5.2%
-118.4%
Q2 24
5.9%
-3.1%
EPS (diluted)
RM
RM
SBDS
SBDS
Q1 26
$1.18
Q4 25
$1.30
$-45.73
Q3 25
$1.42
$-9.22
Q2 25
$1.03
$-8.93
Q1 25
$0.70
$-0.21
Q4 24
$0.96
$-27.74
Q3 24
$0.76
$-47.72
Q2 24
$0.86
$-2.14

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
RM
RM
SBDS
SBDS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$20.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$242.1M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$375.8M
$46.0M
Total Assets
$2.1B
$360.3M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
5.26×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
RM
RM
SBDS
SBDS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$20.0M
Q3 25
$16.3M
Q2 25
$18.1M
Q1 25
$206.4M
Q4 24
$12.0M
Q3 24
$12.5M
Q2 24
$20.1M
Total Debt
RM
RM
SBDS
SBDS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.6B
$242.1M
Q3 25
$1.6B
$235.2M
Q2 25
$1.5B
$238.4M
Q1 25
$1.5B
$427.9M
Q4 24
$1.5B
$150.7M
Q3 24
$1.4B
$161.1M
Q2 24
$1.4B
$162.2M
Stockholders' Equity
RM
RM
SBDS
SBDS
Q1 26
$375.8M
Q4 25
$373.1M
$46.0M
Q3 25
$371.9M
$99.1M
Q2 25
$363.0M
$113.2M
Q1 25
$357.9M
$121.7M
Q4 24
$357.1M
$133.7M
Q3 24
$352.9M
$168.0M
Q2 24
$344.9M
$236.7M
Total Assets
RM
RM
SBDS
SBDS
Q1 26
$2.1B
Q4 25
$2.1B
$360.3M
Q3 25
$2.0B
$431.0M
Q2 25
$2.0B
$459.7M
Q1 25
$1.9B
$692.4M
Q4 24
$1.9B
$495.1M
Q3 24
$1.8B
$553.2M
Q2 24
$1.8B
$642.0M
Debt / Equity
RM
RM
SBDS
SBDS
Q1 26
Q4 25
4.40×
5.26×
Q3 25
4.23×
2.37×
Q2 25
4.14×
2.11×
Q1 25
4.11×
3.52×
Q4 24
4.12×
1.13×
Q3 24
3.94×
0.96×
Q2 24
3.98×
0.69×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
RM
RM
SBDS
SBDS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$6.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
RM
RM
SBDS
SBDS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$309.1M
$6.4M
Q3 25
$86.7M
$11.2M
Q2 25
$78.7M
$10.9M
Q1 25
$63.7M
$-75.2M
Q4 24
$268.9M
$13.0M
Q3 24
$75.1M
$378.0K
Q2 24
$71.5M
$15.7M
Free Cash Flow
RM
RM
SBDS
SBDS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$304.3M
Q3 25
$85.7M
Q2 25
$77.6M
Q1 25
$62.4M
$-78.4M
Q4 24
$263.9M
$9.0M
Q3 24
$73.8M
$-5.9M
Q2 24
$70.3M
$12.8M
FCF Margin
RM
RM
SBDS
SBDS
Q1 26
Q4 25
179.3%
Q3 25
51.8%
Q2 25
49.3%
Q1 25
40.8%
-101.5%
Q4 24
170.4%
6.3%
Q3 24
50.4%
-6.3%
Q2 24
49.1%
9.8%
Capex Intensity
RM
RM
SBDS
SBDS
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.8%
Q3 25
0.6%
Q2 25
0.6%
Q1 25
0.8%
4.2%
Q4 24
3.3%
2.8%
Q3 24
0.9%
6.7%
Q2 24
0.8%
2.2%
Cash Conversion
RM
RM
SBDS
SBDS
Q1 26
Q4 25
23.94×
Q3 25
6.04×
Q2 25
7.76×
Q1 25
9.09×
Q4 24
27.13×
Q3 24
9.80×
Q2 24
8.47×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

RM
RM

Segment breakdown not available.

SBDS
SBDS

Sales Channel Directly To Consumer$65.4M70%
Sales Channel Through Intermediary$28.6M30%

Related Comparisons