vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX) and STRATASYS LTD. (SSYS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STRATASYS LTD. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($137.0M vs $71.1M, roughly 1.9× RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.). RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 2.0% vs -40.6%, a 42.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.8% vs -2.2%). RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($33.5M vs $2.5M). Over the past eight quarters, RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-4.7% CAGR vs -7.4%).
RE/MAX is an international real estate franchise operating in over 100 countries and territories that, in 2015, had over 100,000 agents in 6,800 offices.
Stratasys, Ltd. is an American-Israeli manufacturer of 3D printers, software, and materials for polymer additive manufacturing as well as 3D-printed parts on-demand. The company is incorporated in Israel. Engineers use Stratasys systems to model complex geometries in a wide range of polymer materials, including: ABS, polyphenylsulfone (PPSF), polycarbonate (PC), polyetherimide and Nylon 12.
RMAX vs SSYS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $71.1M | $137.0M |
| Net Profit | $1.4M | $-55.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | 13.1% | -16.6% |
| Net Margin | 2.0% | -40.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.8% | -2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -75.2% | -109.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $71.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.2M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.8M | $138.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.5M | $136.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $72.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.5M | $140.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.5M | $138.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $78.3M | $144.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $-55.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.0M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $966.0K | $-26.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7M | $-25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.4M | $-26.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 44.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.4% |
| Q4 25 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.0% | -16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | -9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.4% | -18.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.6% | -18.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | -17.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | -12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.6% | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | -19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -18.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.3% | -18.0% |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $118.7M | $71.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $432.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $452.4M | $852.5M |
| Total Assets | $582.5M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.96× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $118.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.5M | $71.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.3M | $71.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $89.1M | $70.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.8M | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.1M | $70.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $82.1M | $91.1M |
| Q4 25 | $432.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $433.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $434.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $435.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $437.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $438.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $452.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $448.1M | $852.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $442.4M | $902.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $433.5M | $784.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $429.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $423.1M | $831.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $418.4M | $850.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $412.0M | $866.1M |
| Q4 25 | $582.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $582.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $574.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $571.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $581.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $578.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $571.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $566.7M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | 0.96× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.97× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.02× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.07× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $40.9M | $6.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $33.5M | $2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 47.1% | 1.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.4% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 28.39× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $56.8M | $-11.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $40.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.7M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.6M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.9M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.4M | $7.3M |
| Q4 25 | $33.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.4M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0M | $789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $53.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.3M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.0M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.8M | $5.0M |
| Q4 25 | 47.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 73.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.8% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.3% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | 28.39× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.45× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.97× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.28× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.22× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.29× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RMAX
| Franchising Segment | $50.1M | 70% |
| Broker Fees | $13.9M | 20% |
| Annual Dues | $7.4M | 10% |
SSYS
Segment breakdown not available.
