vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD (RNR) and Stanley Black & Decker (SWK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Stanley Black & Decker is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.7× RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD). RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD runs the higher net margin — 23.5% vs 1.4%, a 22.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Stanley Black & Decker posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.1% vs -36.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Stanley Black & Decker's revenue compounded faster (0.3% CAGR vs -11.9%).
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd is a Bermudian provider of reinsurance, insurance and other related business services. The company operates in reinsurance, insurance and ventures.
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., formerly known as The Stanley Works, is an American manufacturer of industrial tools and household hardware, and a provider of security products. Headquartered in the Greater Hartford city of New Britain, Connecticut, Stanley Black & Decker is the result of the merger of The Stanley Works and Black & Decker on March 12, 2010.
RNR vs SWK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $3.8B |
| Net Profit | $515.8M | $51.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 31.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 23.5% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -36.8% | 0.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 72.6% | -43.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $6.57 | $0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $4.0B |
| Q1 26 | $515.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $760.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $916.5M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $835.4M | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $170.0M | $90.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-189.7M | $194.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $91.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $503.9M | $-11.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.7% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.0% | 9.5% |
| Q1 26 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.1% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.3% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.8% | -0.3% |
| Q1 26 | $6.57 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.16 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.40 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.20 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.27 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.76 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.62 | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.41 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.6B | $268.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.3B | $9.0B |
| Total Assets | $53.7B | $21.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $268.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $311.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $344.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $290.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $298.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $318.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $6.1B |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.5B | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8B | $9.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6B | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.2B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2B | $8.7B |
| Q1 26 | $53.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $53.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.5B | $21.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.7B | $22.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.6B | $22.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.7B | $21.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.8B | $22.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.6B | $22.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.19× | 0.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.21× | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.27× | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.18× | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.17× | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.19× | 0.70× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $221.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $155.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 4.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.30× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $369.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $483.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $221.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $214.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.8M | $-420.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $778.9M | $679.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $285.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $573.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $134.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-485.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $564.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $485.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.73× | 4.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.76× | 2.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.93× | -4.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.26× | 3.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.41× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RNR
Segment breakdown not available.
SWK
| Tools And Outdoor Segment | $3.3B | 87% |
| Engineered Fastening Segment | $500.5M | 13% |
