vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ROGERS CORP (ROG) and TRICO BANCSHARES (TCBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ROGERS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($200.5M vs $109.4M, roughly 1.8× TRICO BANCSHARES ). TRICO BANCSHARES runs the higher net margin — 251.6% vs 2.2%, a 249.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TRICO BANCSHARES posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.0% vs 5.2%). TRICO BANCSHARES produced more free cash flow last quarter ($127.9M vs $1.1M). Over the past eight quarters, TRICO BANCSHARES 's revenue compounded faster (5.4% CAGR vs -3.3%).
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
Trico Bancshares is a U.S.-headquartered regional bank holding company operating Tri Counties Bank. It offers a full range of retail and commercial banking services including deposit products, mortgages, small business loans, and wealth management, primarily serving consumers and SMEs in Northern California.
ROG vs TCBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $200.5M | $109.4M |
| Net Profit | $4.5M | $33.6M |
| Gross Margin | 32.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 42.6% |
| Net Margin | 2.2% | 251.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.2% | 9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 421.4% | 15.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.25 | $1.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $200.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $201.5M | $109.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.0M | $107.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $202.8M | $103.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $190.5M | $98.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.2M | $100.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $210.3M | $99.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $214.2M | $97.9M |
| Q1 26 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.6M | $33.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6M | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-73.6M | $27.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.4M | $26.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-500.0K | $29.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.7M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1M | $29.0M |
| Q1 26 | 32.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.3% | 43.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.3% | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | 35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.6% | 38.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | 39.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 40.0% |
| Q1 26 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | 251.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.0% | 31.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -36.3% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.7% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.3% | 221.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | 29.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | 29.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.25 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.20 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.48 | $1.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.00 | $0.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | $0.80 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.04 | $0.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.58 | $0.88 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.44 | $0.87 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $195.8M | $157.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $195.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $197.0M | $157.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $167.8M | $298.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $157.2M | $314.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $175.6M | $308.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.8M | $145.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $146.4M | $320.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.9M | $206.6M |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $9.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $9.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.8M | $133.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.1M | $127.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.5% | 116.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.29× | 3.96× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $70.1M | $222.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $5.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $46.9M | $133.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.9M | $45.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.7M | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $24.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.7M | $109.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.4M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.9M | $31.8M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $42.2M | $127.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.2M | $43.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $28.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $22.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.3M | $105.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.2M | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.8M | $30.8M |
| Q1 26 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.9% | 116.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | 40.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 27.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 104.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.0% | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 31.5% |
| Q1 26 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 1.0% |
| Q1 26 | 1.29× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.20× | 3.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.36× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.96× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.83× | 1.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
