vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Rockwell Automation (ROK) and Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Molson Coors Beverage Company is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.7B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.3× Rockwell Automation). Rockwell Automation runs the higher net margin — 14.5% vs 5.5%, a 9.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Rockwell Automation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.9% vs 2.0%). Rockwell Automation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($170.0M vs $-212.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Rockwell Automation's revenue compounded faster (-0.5% CAGR vs -15.8%).
Rockwell Automation, Inc. is an American provider of industrial automation and digital transformation technologies headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Its brands include Allen-Bradley, FactoryTalk software and LifecycleIQ Services. Rockwell Automation employs approximately 27,000 people and has customers in more than 100 countries worldwide.
Molson Coors Beverage Company is a Canadian-American multinational drink and brewing company headquartered in Chicago, Illinois and Montreal, Quebec.
ROK vs TAP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $2.7B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $150.1M |
| Gross Margin | 48.3% | 33.0% |
| Operating Margin | 20.7% | — |
| Net Margin | 14.5% | 5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.9% | 2.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 65.8% | 25.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.69 | $0.80 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $150.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $305.0M | $238.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.0M | $-2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $295.0M | $428.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $252.0M | $121.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $184.0M | $287.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.1M | $199.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.0M | $427.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 33.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 48.3% | 31.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.4% | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.9% | 34.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.5% | 31.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.4% | 32.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.9% | 33.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.8% | 34.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.7% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | -98.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.0% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.9% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.1% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | 15.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.0% | -84.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.8% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.6% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.8% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.3% | 11.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.80 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.69 | $1.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.24 | $-14.79 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.60 | $2.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.22 | $0.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.61 | $1.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.09 | $0.96 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.02 | $2.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $444.0M | $382.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.7B | $10.3B |
| Total Assets | $11.2B | $22.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.38× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $444.0M | $896.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $468.0M | $950.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $495.0M | $613.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $456.0M | $412.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $477.0M | $969.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $471.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $407.0M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $10.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $10.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $10.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | $13.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5B | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $13.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.2B | $22.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.2B | $22.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.2B | $26.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.0B | $25.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.9B | $26.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.2B | $26.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $27.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | 0.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.73× | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $234.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $170.0M | $-212.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.1% | -7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.77× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $234.0M | $540.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $454.0M | $616.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $527.0M | $718.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $199.0M | $-90.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $364.0M | $494.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $432.3M | $521.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $279.1M | $869.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-212.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $170.0M | $357.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $483.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $489.0M | $555.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $171.0M | $-328.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $293.0M | $383.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $350.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $238.4M | $691.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | -7.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | -12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.6% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.6% | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 4.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.77× | 2.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.29× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.79× | 1.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.79× | -0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.81× | 2.61× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.20× | 2.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ROK
| Productsand Solutions | $1.9B | 89% |
| Lifecycle Services Segment | $259.0M | 12% |
TAP
Segment breakdown not available.
