vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Rockwell Automation (ROK) and MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp (VAC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Rockwell Automation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.7× MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp). Rockwell Automation runs the higher net margin — 14.5% vs -35.0%, a 49.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Rockwell Automation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.9% vs -0.7%). Rockwell Automation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($170.0M vs $-6.0M). Over the past eight quarters, MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp's revenue compounded faster (5.2% CAGR vs -0.5%).
Rockwell Automation, Inc. is an American provider of industrial automation and digital transformation technologies headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Its brands include Allen-Bradley, FactoryTalk software and LifecycleIQ Services. Rockwell Automation employs approximately 27,000 people and has customers in more than 100 countries worldwide.
Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation is a pure-play public timeshare company. Formerly a division of Marriott International, Marriott Vacations Worldwide was established as a separate, publicly traded entity focusing primarily on vacation ownership in November 2011. Marriott Vacations Worldwide runs more than 120 resorts with over 700,000 Owners and members in a diverse portfolio of brands under The Marriott Vacation Clubs name. Its brands include Marriott Vacation Club, The Marriott Vaca...
ROK vs VAC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $-431.0M |
| Gross Margin | 48.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 20.7% | — |
| Net Margin | 14.5% | -35.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.9% | -0.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 65.8% | -962.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.69 | $-12.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $305.0M | $-431.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.0M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $295.0M | $69.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $252.0M | $56.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $184.0M | $50.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.1M | $84.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.0M | $37.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $266.2M | $47.0M |
| Q4 25 | 48.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | -35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.0% | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.8% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.6% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.8% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.5% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | $2.69 | $-12.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.24 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.60 | $1.77 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.22 | $1.46 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.61 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.09 | $2.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.02 | $0.98 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.31 | $1.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $444.0M | $406.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.7B | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $11.2B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $444.0M | $406.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $468.0M | $474.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $495.0M | $205.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $456.0M | $196.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $477.0M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $471.3M | $197.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $407.0M | $206.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $470.5M | $237.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | $11.2B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.2B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.2B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.0B | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.9B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.2B | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $9.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.4B | $9.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $234.0M | $6.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $170.0M | $-6.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.1% | -0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.0% | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.77× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-29.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $234.0M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $454.0M | $62.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $527.0M | $-48.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $199.0M | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $364.0M | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $432.3M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $279.1M | $30.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $119.8M | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | $170.0M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $489.0M | $-68.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $171.0M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $293.0M | $86.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $58.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $238.4M | $17.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $68.6M | $-13.0M |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | -0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.6% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | -1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.4% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.77× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.29× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.79× | -0.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.79× | 0.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 2.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.81× | 0.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.20× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | 0.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ROK
| Productsand Solutions | $1.9B | 89% |
| Lifecycle Services Segment | $259.0M | 12% |
VAC
| Cost Reimbursement | $467.0M | 38% |
| Time Share | $381.0M | 31% |
| Management And Exchange | $212.0M | 17% |
| Ancillary Revenues | $64.0M | 5% |
| Management Service | $55.0M | 4% |
| Service Other | $36.0M | 3% |
