vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Roper Technologies (ROP) and Stanley Black & Decker (SWK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Stanley Black & Decker is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.8× Roper Technologies). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 1.4%, a 14.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs 0.1%). Roper Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($507.0M vs $155.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Roper Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs 0.3%).
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., formerly known as The Stanley Works, is an American manufacturer of industrial tools and household hardware, and a provider of security products. Headquartered in the Greater Hartford city of New Britain, Connecticut, Stanley Black & Decker is the result of the merger of The Stanley Works and Black & Decker on March 12, 2010.
ROP vs SWK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $3.8B |
| Net Profit | $331.0M | $51.4M |
| Gross Margin | 69.4% | 31.4% |
| Operating Margin | 27.2% | — |
| Net Margin | 15.8% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.3% | 0.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 53.7% | -43.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.87 | $0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $4.0B |
| Q1 26 | $331.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $428.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $398.5M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $378.3M | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $331.1M | $90.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $462.3M | $194.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $367.9M | $91.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $337.1M | $-11.2M |
| Q1 26 | 69.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 69.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.5% | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.2% | 27.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 68.7% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 68.3% | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 69.2% | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.5% | 28.4% |
| Q1 26 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.1% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.8% | 9.5% |
| Q1 26 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | -0.3% |
| Q1 26 | $4.87 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.97 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.68 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.49 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.06 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.29 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.40 | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.12 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $382.9M | $268.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $9.7B | $5.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $18.8B | $9.0B |
| Total Assets | $34.6B | $21.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.52× | 0.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $382.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $297.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $320.0M | $268.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $242.4M | $311.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $372.8M | $344.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $188.2M | $290.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $269.6M | $298.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $251.5M | $318.5M |
| Q1 26 | $9.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.6B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.1B |
| Q1 26 | $18.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.0B | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.6B | $9.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.2B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.9B | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.5B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.1B | $8.7B |
| Q1 26 | $34.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.6B | $21.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.2B | $22.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.4B | $22.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.3B | $21.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6B | $22.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.8B | $22.5B |
| Q1 26 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.40× | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $221.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $507.0M | $155.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 24.2% | 4.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.30× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $369.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $738.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $869.5M | $221.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $404.1M | $214.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $528.7M | $-420.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $722.2M | $679.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $755.4M | $285.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $384.1M | $573.0M |
| Q1 26 | $507.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $134.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-485.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $564.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $485.8M |
| Q1 26 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.1% |
| Q1 26 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.18× | 4.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.07× | 2.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.60× | -4.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.56× | 3.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.05× | 3.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.14× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ROP
Segment breakdown not available.
SWK
| Tools And Outdoor Segment | $3.3B | 87% |
| Engineered Fastening Segment | $500.5M | 13% |
