vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Roper Technologies (ROP) and Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Molson Coors Beverage Company is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.7B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.3× Roper Technologies). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 5.5%, a 10.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs 2.0%). Roper Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($507.0M vs $-212.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Roper Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs -15.8%).
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
Molson Coors Beverage Company is a Canadian-American multinational drink and brewing company headquartered in Chicago, Illinois and Montreal, Quebec.
ROP vs TAP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $2.7B |
| Net Profit | $331.0M | $150.1M |
| Gross Margin | 69.4% | 33.0% |
| Operating Margin | 27.2% | — |
| Net Margin | 15.8% | 5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.3% | 2.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 53.7% | 25.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.87 | $0.80 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | $331.0M | $150.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $428.4M | $238.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $398.5M | $-2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $378.3M | $428.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $331.1M | $121.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $462.3M | $287.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $367.9M | $199.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $337.1M | $427.0M |
| Q1 26 | 69.4% | 33.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 69.5% | 31.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.5% | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.2% | 34.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 68.7% | 31.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 68.3% | 32.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 69.2% | 33.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.5% | 34.6% |
| Q1 26 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.6% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.4% | -98.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.2% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.9% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.1% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.8% | 15.6% |
| Q1 26 | 15.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.8% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.8% | -84.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.6% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 11.1% |
| Q1 26 | $4.87 | $0.80 | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.97 | $1.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.68 | $-14.79 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.49 | $2.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.06 | $0.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.29 | $1.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.40 | $0.96 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.12 | $2.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $382.9M | $382.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $9.7B | $3.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $18.8B | $10.3B |
| Total Assets | $34.6B | $22.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.52× | 0.38× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $382.9M | $382.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $297.4M | $896.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $320.0M | $950.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $242.4M | $613.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $372.8M | $412.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $188.2M | $969.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $269.6M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $251.5M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $9.7B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.3B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.6B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.0B |
| Q1 26 | $18.8B | $10.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.9B | $10.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.0B | $10.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.6B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.2B | $13.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.9B | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.5B | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.1B | $13.2B |
| Q1 26 | $34.6B | $22.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.6B | $22.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.6B | $22.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.2B | $26.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.4B | $25.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.3B | $26.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6B | $26.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.8B | $27.4B |
| Q1 26 | 0.52× | 0.38× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.47× | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.40× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $507.0M | $-212.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 24.2% | -7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $738.0M | $540.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $869.5M | $616.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $404.1M | $718.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $528.7M | $-90.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $722.2M | $494.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $755.4M | $521.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $384.1M | $869.2M |
| Q1 26 | $507.0M | $-212.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $357.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $483.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $555.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-328.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $383.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $350.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $691.7M |
| Q1 26 | 24.2% | -7.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.72× | 2.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.07× | 1.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.60× | -0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.56× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.05× | 2.61× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.14× | 2.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
