vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Roper Technologies (ROP) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tapestry, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.2× Roper Technologies). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs 15.8%, a 6.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tapestry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs 11.3%). Tapestry, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.0B vs $507.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs 10.5%).
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
ROP vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $331.0M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | 69.4% | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 27.2% | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | 15.8% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.3% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 53.7% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.87 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $331.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $428.4M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $398.5M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $378.3M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $331.1M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $462.3M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $367.9M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $337.1M | $159.3M |
| Q1 26 | 69.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 69.5% | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.5% | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.2% | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 68.7% | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 68.3% | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 69.2% | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.5% | 74.9% |
| Q1 26 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.6% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.4% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.2% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.9% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.1% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.8% | 14.8% |
| Q1 26 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.8% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.8% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.6% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 10.0% |
| Q1 26 | $4.87 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.97 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.68 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.49 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.06 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.29 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.40 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.12 | $0.67 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $382.9M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $9.7B | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $18.8B | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $34.6B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.52× | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $382.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $297.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $320.0M | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $242.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $372.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $188.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $269.6M | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $251.5M | $7.2B |
| Q1 26 | $9.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.9B |
| Q1 26 | $18.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.9B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.0B | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.6B | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.5B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.1B | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | $34.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.6B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.6B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.2B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.4B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.3B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.8B | $13.4B |
| Q1 26 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.47× | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.40× | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.39× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $507.0M | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 24.2% | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $738.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $869.5M | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $404.1M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $528.7M | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $722.2M | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $755.4M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $384.1M | $256.0M |
| Q1 26 | $507.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $209.8M |
| Q1 26 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.2% |
| Q1 26 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.72× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.18× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.60× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.56× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.05× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.14× | 1.61× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ROP
Segment breakdown not available.
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
