vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS INC (RRGB) and RISKIFIED LTD. (RSKD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($283.7M vs $234.0M, roughly 1.2× RISKIFIED LTD.). RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS INC runs the higher net margin — 1.4% vs -13.2%, a 14.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Inc is a U.S.-headquartered casual dining restaurant chain that specializes in a broad range of gourmet burgers, plus appetizers, signature milkshakes, salads, sandwiches and other family-friendly menu items. It runs outlets across many U.S. states, providing both dine-in and takeout options for consumers with different dining needs.
Riskified is a publicly traded software company headquartered in Tel Aviv, Israel, with additional offices in New York City. The company provides software-as-a-service (SaaS) solutions focused on fraud prevention, chargeback management, and risk intelligence for e-commerce merchants.
RRGB vs RSKD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $283.7M | $234.0M |
| Net Profit | $4.0M | $-30.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.2% |
| Operating Margin | 3.5% | -19.0% |
| Net Margin | 1.4% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 142.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.21 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $283.7M | $234.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $392.4M | $155.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $76.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $300.2M | $213.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $388.5M | $141.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $68.9M | ||
| Q3 23 | $298.6M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $417.8M | — |
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $-30.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.5M | $-55.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.5M | $-34.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-18.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-3.3M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 52.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 53.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 55.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 51.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 52.0% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | -19.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | -19.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -20.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.5% | -32.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.5% | -31.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -33.4% | ||
| Q3 23 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 1.0% | — |
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | -13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | -13.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.2% | -26.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | -24.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -26.1% | ||
| Q3 23 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -0.8% | — |
| Q3 25 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.61 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.61 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.20 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $24.4M | $371.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-78.6M | $382.3M |
| Total Assets | $586.9M | $495.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $24.4M | $371.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.1M | $371.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $371.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.1M | $440.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.6M | $440.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $440.8M | ||
| Q3 23 | $44.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $49.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | $-78.6M | $382.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-80.4M | $382.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $382.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-36.5M | $491.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-29.1M | $491.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $491.7M | ||
| Q3 23 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $944.0K | — |
| Q3 25 | $586.9M | $495.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $606.2M | $495.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $495.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $689.1M | $601.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $717.1M | $601.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $601.9M | ||
| Q3 23 | $798.4M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $803.9M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.49× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $11.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $512.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $883.0K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $17.3M | — |
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-8.8M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $1.3M | — |
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -3.0% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 0.3% | — |
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 3.8% | — |
| Q3 25 | 2.49× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.67× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RRGB
| Food And Beverage | $279.3M | 98% |
| Franchise | $3.2M | 1% |
| Products And Services Gift Card | $1.8M | 1% |
| Product And Service Gift Card And Other | $1.2M | 0% |
RSKD
Segment breakdown not available.