vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of RELIANCE, INC. (RS) and Science Applications International Corp (SAIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RELIANCE, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.5B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.9× Science Applications International Corp). Science Applications International Corp runs the higher net margin — 4.2% vs 3.3%, a 0.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RELIANCE, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.9% vs 2.6%). RELIANCE, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($202.9M vs $120.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Science Applications International Corp's revenue compounded faster (2.3% CAGR vs -2.0%).
Reliance, Inc. (Reliance), headquartered in Scottsdale, Arizona, is the largest metals service center operator in North America. The company provides metals processing services and distributes a line of approximately 100,000 metal products, including aluminum, brass, alloy, copper, carbon steel, stainless steel, titanium, and specialty metal products to 125,000 customers such as fabricators and manufacturers.
Science Applications International Corporation, Inc. (SAIC) is an American technology company headquartered in Reston, Virginia that provides government services and information technology support.
RS vs SAIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.5B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $116.9M | $78.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 12.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.8% | 6.9% |
| Net Margin | 3.3% | 4.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.9% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.3% | -3.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.23 | $1.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $116.9M | $78.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $189.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $234.2M | $68.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $200.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.0M | $106.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $199.2M | $81.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $268.3M | $77.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $303.8M | $39.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.5% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.8% | 4.5% |
| Q4 25 | 3.3% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.3% | 2.2% |
| Q4 25 | $2.23 | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.59 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.42 | $1.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.74 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.05 | $2.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.61 | $1.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.67 | $1.48 | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.23 | $0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $216.6M | $45.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.2B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $10.4B | $5.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.64× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $216.6M | $45.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $239.5M | $47.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $277.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.1M | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $314.6M | $48.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $350.8M | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $934.9M | $94.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $7.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.9B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $10.4B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.3B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.7B | $5.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.18× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $276.1M | $129.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $202.9M | $120.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.8% | 6.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.36× | 1.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $502.5M | $478.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $276.1M | $129.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $229.0M | $100.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $473.3M | $143.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $463.9M | $138.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $366.3M | $98.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $126.3M | $63.0M |
| Q4 25 | $202.9M | $120.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $180.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.4M | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.4M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $351.1M | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $268.1M | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $52.0M |
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.6% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.36× | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.38× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.98× | 1.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.47× | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.33× | 1.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.37× | 1.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.42× | 1.62× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RS
| Carbon Steel | $1.9B | 55% |
| Aluminum | $624.5M | 18% |
| Stainless Steel | $467.1M | 13% |
| Alloy Steel | $155.5M | 4% |
| Toll Processing | $155.3M | 4% |
| Copper And Brass | $93.5M | 3% |
| Other Products Or Services | $80.4M | 2% |
SAIC
| Prime Contractor | $1.3B | 71% |
| Civilian | $427.0M | 23% |
| Subcontractor | $116.0M | 6% |
| Commercial State And Local Agencies | $7.0M | 0% |
