vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Republic Services (RSG) and Stanley Black & Decker (SWK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Republic Services is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.1B vs $3.8B, roughly 1.1× Stanley Black & Decker). Republic Services runs the higher net margin — 12.8% vs 1.5%, a 11.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Stanley Black & Decker posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.7% vs 2.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Republic Services's revenue compounded faster (0.8% CAGR vs -0.3%).
Republic Services, Inc. is a North American waste disposal company whose services include non-hazardous solid waste collection, waste transfer, waste disposal, recycling, and energy services. It is the second largest provider of waste disposal in the United States after Waste Management. Its operations primarily consist of providing collection, transfer, and disposal of non-hazardous solid waste, recovering and recycling of certain materials, and energy services. The company is 35.
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., formerly known as The Stanley Works, is an American manufacturer of industrial tools and household hardware, and a provider of security products. Headquartered in the Greater Hartford city of New Britain, Connecticut, Stanley Black & Decker is the result of the merger of The Stanley Works and Black & Decker on March 12, 2010.
RSG vs SWK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2027
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1B | $3.8B |
| Net Profit | $525.0M | $59.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 30.1% |
| Operating Margin | 20.2% | 4.2% |
| Net Margin | 12.8% | 1.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.1% | -34.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.70 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $4.1B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $4.0B |
| Q1 26 | $525.0M | $59.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $544.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $549.7M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $549.9M | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $495.0M | $90.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $512.2M | $194.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $565.7M | $91.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $511.5M | $-11.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.5% | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.2% | 27.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.3% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.7% | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.9% | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.1% | 28.4% |
| Q1 26 | 20.2% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.1% | 9.5% |
| Q1 26 | 12.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.7% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | -0.3% |
| Q1 26 | $1.70 | $0.39 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.76 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.76 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.75 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.58 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.63 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.80 | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.62 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $118.0M | $333.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $13.3B | $6.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $12.0B | — |
| Total Assets | $34.6B | $21.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.11× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $118.0M | $333.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $76.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $84.0M | $268.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.0M | $311.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.0M | $344.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.0M | $290.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.4M | $298.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $490.6M | $318.5M |
| Q1 26 | $13.3B | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.4B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.5B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.9B | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.0B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $6.1B |
| Q1 26 | $12.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9B | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.1B | $9.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.4B | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.2B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0B | $8.7B |
| Q1 26 | $34.6B | $21.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.8B | $21.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.4B | $22.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.1B | $22.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.4B | $21.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.8B | $22.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.9B | $22.5B |
| Q1 26 | 1.11× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.04× | 0.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.04× | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.10× | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.04× | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.07× | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.05× | 0.70× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-388.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-447.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -11.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -6.52× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-642.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-388.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $981.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $221.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $214.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $-420.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $679.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $285.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $573.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-447.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $404.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $737.0M | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $702.0M | $134.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.0M | $-485.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $524.4M | $564.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $563.6M | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $696.0M | $485.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | -11.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.5% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.1% | -13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.8% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.2% | 12.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.3% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.0% | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | -6.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.80× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.15× | 4.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.02× | 2.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.07× | -4.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.00× | 3.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.77× | 3.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.15× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RSG
| Small-container | $1.3B | 32% |
| Large-container | $768.0M | 19% |
| Landfill, net | $453.0M | 11% |
| Transfer | $440.0M | 11% |
| Environmental solutions | $417.0M | 10% |
| Environmental solutions, net | $405.0M | 10% |
| Transfer, net | $200.0M | 5% |
| Recycling processing and commodity sales | $112.0M | 3% |
SWK
Segment breakdown not available.
