vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Sunrun Inc. (RUN) and Teradyne (TER). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Teradyne is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.1× Sunrun Inc.). Teradyne runs the higher net margin — 31.1% vs 8.9%, a 22.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sunrun Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (123.5% vs 87.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Sunrun Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (59.0% CAGR vs 32.6%).

Sunrun Inc. is an American provider of photovoltaic systems and battery energy storage products, primarily for residential customers. The company was established in 2007 and is headquartered in San Francisco, California.

Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.

RUN vs TER — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TER
TER
1.1× larger
TER
$1.3B
$1.2B
RUN
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
RUN
RUN
+36.5% gap
RUN
123.5%
87.0%
TER
Higher net margin
TER
TER
22.2% more per $
TER
31.1%
8.9%
RUN
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
RUN
RUN
Annualised
RUN
59.0%
32.6%
TER

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
RUN
RUN
TER
TER
Revenue
$1.2B
$1.3B
Net Profit
$103.6M
$398.9M
Gross Margin
60.9%
Operating Margin
8.4%
36.9%
Net Margin
8.9%
31.1%
Revenue YoY
123.5%
87.0%
Net Profit YoY
103.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.38
$2.53

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
RUN
RUN
TER
TER
Q1 26
$1.3B
Q4 25
$1.2B
$1.1B
Q3 25
$724.6M
$769.2M
Q2 25
$569.3M
$651.8M
Q1 25
$504.3M
$685.7M
Q4 24
$518.5M
$752.9M
Q3 24
$537.2M
$737.3M
Q2 24
$523.9M
$729.9M
Net Profit
RUN
RUN
TER
TER
Q1 26
$398.9M
Q4 25
$103.6M
$257.2M
Q3 25
$16.6M
$119.6M
Q2 25
$279.8M
$78.4M
Q1 25
$50.0M
$98.9M
Q4 24
$-2.8B
$146.3M
Q3 24
$-83.8M
$145.6M
Q2 24
$139.1M
$186.3M
Gross Margin
RUN
RUN
TER
TER
Q1 26
60.9%
Q4 25
57.2%
Q3 25
58.4%
Q2 25
57.2%
Q1 25
60.6%
Q4 24
59.4%
Q3 24
59.2%
Q2 24
58.3%
Operating Margin
RUN
RUN
TER
TER
Q1 26
36.9%
Q4 25
8.4%
27.1%
Q3 25
0.5%
18.9%
Q2 25
-19.7%
13.9%
Q1 25
-22.8%
17.6%
Q4 24
-628.0%
20.4%
Q3 24
-23.8%
20.6%
Q2 24
-24.4%
28.8%
Net Margin
RUN
RUN
TER
TER
Q1 26
31.1%
Q4 25
8.9%
23.7%
Q3 25
2.3%
15.5%
Q2 25
49.1%
12.0%
Q1 25
9.9%
14.4%
Q4 24
-542.7%
19.4%
Q3 24
-15.6%
19.8%
Q2 24
26.5%
25.5%
EPS (diluted)
RUN
RUN
TER
TER
Q1 26
$2.53
Q4 25
$0.38
$1.62
Q3 25
$0.06
$0.75
Q2 25
$1.07
$0.49
Q1 25
$0.20
$0.61
Q4 24
$-12.59
$0.89
Q3 24
$-0.37
$0.89
Q2 24
$0.55
$1.14

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
RUN
RUN
TER
TER
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$241.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$14.7B
$0
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.1B
Total Assets
$22.6B
$4.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
4.69×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
RUN
RUN
TER
TER
Q1 26
$241.9M
Q4 25
$293.8M
Q3 25
$272.7M
Q2 25
$339.3M
Q1 25
$475.6M
Q4 24
$553.4M
Q3 24
$510.0M
Q2 24
$421.9M
Total Debt
RUN
RUN
TER
TER
Q1 26
$0
Q4 25
$14.7B
Q3 25
$14.6B
Q2 25
$14.0B
Q1 25
$13.6B
Q4 24
$12.9B
Q3 24
$12.5B
Q2 24
$12.0B
Stockholders' Equity
RUN
RUN
TER
TER
Q1 26
Q4 25
$3.1B
$2.8B
Q3 25
$3.0B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$2.9B
$2.8B
Q1 25
$2.6B
$2.8B
Q4 24
$2.6B
$2.8B
Q3 24
$5.3B
$2.9B
Q2 24
$5.4B
$2.7B
Total Assets
RUN
RUN
TER
TER
Q1 26
$4.4B
Q4 25
$22.6B
$4.2B
Q3 25
$22.2B
$4.0B
Q2 25
$21.2B
$3.8B
Q1 25
$20.4B
$3.7B
Q4 24
$19.9B
$3.7B
Q3 24
$22.1B
$3.8B
Q2 24
$21.4B
$3.6B
Debt / Equity
RUN
RUN
TER
TER
Q1 26
Q4 25
4.69×
Q3 25
4.90×
Q2 25
4.80×
Q1 25
5.19×
Q4 24
5.05×
Q3 24
2.36×
Q2 24
2.23×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
RUN
RUN
TER
TER
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$96.9M
$265.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.94×
0.66×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
RUN
RUN
TER
TER
Q1 26
$265.1M
Q4 25
$96.9M
$281.6M
Q3 25
$-121.5M
$49.0M
Q2 25
$-292.7M
$182.1M
Q1 25
$-104.2M
$161.6M
Q4 24
$-258.4M
$282.6M
Q3 24
$-156.2M
$166.3M
Q2 24
$-208.5M
$216.1M
Free Cash Flow
RUN
RUN
TER
TER
Q1 26
Q4 25
$218.8M
Q3 25
$2.4M
Q2 25
$131.7M
Q1 25
$97.6M
Q4 24
$225.2M
Q3 24
$-156.4M
$114.4M
Q2 24
$171.2M
FCF Margin
RUN
RUN
TER
TER
Q1 26
Q4 25
20.2%
Q3 25
0.3%
Q2 25
20.2%
Q1 25
14.2%
Q4 24
29.9%
Q3 24
-29.1%
15.5%
Q2 24
23.5%
Capex Intensity
RUN
RUN
TER
TER
Q1 26
Q4 25
5.8%
Q3 25
6.1%
Q2 25
7.7%
Q1 25
9.3%
Q4 24
7.6%
Q3 24
0.0%
7.0%
Q2 24
6.1%
Cash Conversion
RUN
RUN
TER
TER
Q1 26
0.66×
Q4 25
0.94×
1.09×
Q3 25
-7.33×
0.41×
Q2 25
-1.05×
2.32×
Q1 25
-2.08×
1.63×
Q4 24
1.93×
Q3 24
1.14×
Q2 24
-1.50×
1.16×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

RUN
RUN

Products$692.3M60%
Customer Agreements$435.2M38%
Manufactured Product Other$56.7M5%
Incentives$31.3M3%

TER
TER

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons