vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Rackspace Technology, Inc. (RXT) and E.W. SCRIPPS Co (SSP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Rackspace Technology, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($682.8M vs $560.3M, roughly 1.2× E.W. SCRIPPS Co). Rackspace Technology, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -4.8% vs -5.1%, a 0.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Rackspace Technology, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.4% vs -23.1%). Rackspace Technology, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($56.0M vs $31.2M). Over the past eight quarters, E.W. SCRIPPS Co's revenue compounded faster (-0.1% CAGR vs -0.6%).
Rackspace Technology, Inc. is an American cloud computing company based in San Antonio, Texas. It also has offices in Reston, Virginia, as well as in Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, India, Dubai, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Germany, Singapore, Mexico, Toronto and Hong Kong. Its data centers are located in Amsterdam (Netherlands), Virginia (USA), Chicago (USA), Dallas (USA), London (UK), Frankfurt (Germany), Hong Kong (China), Kansas City (USA), New York City (USA), San Jose (USA), Shangh...
The E. W. Scripps Company, also known as Scripps, is an American broadcasting company founded in 1878 as a chain of daily newspapers by Edward Willis "E. W." Scripps and his sister, Ellen Browning Scripps. It was also formerly a media conglomerate. The company is headquartered at the Scripps Center in Cincinnati, Ohio. Its corporate motto is "Give light and the people will find their own way", which is symbolized by the media empire's longtime lighthouse logo.
RXT vs SSP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $682.8M | $560.3M |
| Net Profit | $-32.7M | $-28.5M |
| Gross Margin | 17.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.5% | 7.5% |
| Net Margin | -4.8% | -5.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.4% | -23.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 41.6% | -129.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.13 | $-0.51 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $682.8M | $560.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $671.2M | $525.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $666.3M | $540.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $665.4M | $524.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $685.6M | $728.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $675.8M | $646.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $684.9M | $573.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $690.8M | $561.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-32.7M | $-28.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-67.1M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-54.5M | $-36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-71.5M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-56.0M | $95.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-186.6M | $47.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.0M | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-640.6M | $1.6M |
| Q4 25 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.5% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.1% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.8% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.8% | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.2% | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -25.7% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -94.5% | 7.7% |
| Q4 25 | -4.8% | -5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.0% | -6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.2% | -6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.7% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.2% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -27.6% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -92.7% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.13 | $-0.51 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.28 | $-0.55 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.23 | $-0.59 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.31 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.20 | $0.94 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.82 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.91 | $-0.15 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $105.8M | $27.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-1.2B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $2.8B | $5.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $105.8M | $27.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.5M | $54.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $103.9M | $31.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $128.0M | $24.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $144.0M | $23.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.1M | $34.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $190.2M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $282.6M | $30.2M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $-1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-949.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-756.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-787.2M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $5.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $5.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $59.7M | $45.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $56.0M | $31.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.2% | 5.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $90.6M | $6.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $59.7M | $45.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $70.7M | $21.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4M | $-10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.3M | $153.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | $140.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.1M | $26.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-90.3M | $45.4M |
| Q4 25 | $56.0M | $31.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.7M | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.4M | $-22.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.4M | $146.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.3M | $127.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.5M | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-118.4M | $23.3M |
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.9% | -4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | -1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -17.1% | 4.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | 3.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.94× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.96× | 18.45× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.94× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RXT
| Public Cloud Services Segment | $442.2M | 65% |
| Private Cloud Service Segment | $240.6M | 35% |
SSP
| Local Media Segment | $355.1M | 63% |
| Scripps Networks | $199.5M | 36% |
| Political Advertising Revenue | $10.0M | 2% |
