vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Science Applications International Corp (SAIC) and SEALED AIR CORP (SEE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Science Applications International Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.3× SEALED AIR CORP). Science Applications International Corp runs the higher net margin — 4.2% vs 3.1%, a 1.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Science Applications International Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.6% vs 2.6%). SEALED AIR CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($257.7M vs $120.0M). Over the past eight quarters, SEALED AIR CORP's revenue compounded faster (2.7% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Science Applications International Corporation, Inc. (SAIC) is an American technology company headquartered in Reston, Virginia that provides government services and information technology support.
Sealed Air Corporation is a global provider of innovative packaging and protective solutions. Its core offerings include cushioning materials, food safety and preservation packaging, and sustainable waste-reducing packaging systems, serving retail, e-commerce, food and beverage, and industrial manufacturing markets worldwide.
SAIC vs SEE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $78.0M | $43.8M |
| Gross Margin | 12.2% | 28.6% |
| Operating Margin | 6.9% | 11.4% |
| Net Margin | 4.2% | 3.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3.7% | 700.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.69 | $0.30 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $78.0M | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $255.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $68.0M | $93.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $113.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.0M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.0M | $91.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.0M | $98.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.0M | $82.0M |
| Q4 25 | 12.2% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.1% | 30.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 30.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.0% | 30.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | 30.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 31.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.1% | 30.3% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 15.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.5% | 14.0% |
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | $1.69 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.42 | $0.63 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.13 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.58 | $0.63 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.48 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.77 | $0.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $45.0M | $344.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.5B | $3.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $7.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.64× | 2.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $344.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $282.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.0M | $354.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $335.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.0M | $371.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.0M | $386.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.0M | $388.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $94.0M | $352.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $4.5B |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $953.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $797.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $624.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $771.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $650.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $598.3M |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | $7.2B |
| Q4 25 | 1.64× | 2.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.52× | 4.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.34× | 6.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.33× | 5.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.18× | 6.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.18× | 7.49× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $129.0M | $293.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $120.0M | $257.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.4% | 18.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 2.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.65× | 6.70× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $478.0M | $458.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $129.0M | $293.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $165.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | $136.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $31.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.0M | $244.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $138.0M | $170.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.0M | $188.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.0M | $125.1M |
| Q4 25 | $120.0M | $257.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $119.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.0M | $93.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $134.0M | $185.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.0M | $115.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.0M | $129.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.0M | $78.0M |
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | 18.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.8% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | 5.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 3.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.65× | 6.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.47× | 1.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.70× | 1.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | 1.91× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.62× | 1.53× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SAIC
| Prime Contractor | $1.3B | 71% |
| Civilian | $427.0M | 23% |
| Subcontractor | $116.0M | 6% |
| Commercial State And Local Agencies | $7.0M | 0% |
SEE
| Protective Segment | $1.1B | 78% |
| Other | $292.0M | 21% |
| Pension Plans Defined Benefit | $7.9M | 1% |
