How do EchoStar CORP and Yum! Brands compare by revenue?

EchoStar CORP reported revenue of $3.8B in Q4 FY2025, while Yum! Brands reported $2.5B in Q4 FY2025. EchoStar CORP is 1.5× larger by last-quarter revenue.

Which is growing revenue faster, EchoStar CORP or Yum! Brands?

EchoStar CORP's latest revenue grew -4.3% year-over-year, versus 6.5% for Yum! Brands. Yum! Brands is growing faster on a YoY basis.

Which has a higher net margin, EchoStar CORP or Yum! Brands?

EchoStar CORP's net margin is -31.8% vs Yum! Brands's 21.3%. Yum! Brands has the higher bottom-line margin.

Which generates more free cash flow, EchoStar CORP or Yum! Brands?

EchoStar CORP generated $-583.4M of free cash flow last quarter, versus $482.0M for Yum! Brands. Free cash flow is operating cash flow minus capital expenditure — what's actually left for dividends, buybacks and debt repayment.

What is the 2-year revenue CAGR for EchoStar CORP vs Yum! Brands?

Over the trailing 8 quarters, EchoStar CORP compounded revenue at roughly -2.8% per year, versus 25.5% for Yum! Brands. Yum! Brands has the faster medium-term growth trajectory.

Where does this SATS vs YUM data come from?

All figures are parsed directly from SEC EDGAR 10-Q / 10-K / 20-F / 6-K filings (for US-listed issuers) or EDINET filings (for Japanese issuers), then normalised into a common schema. Numbers update automatically as new filings are released.

vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of EchoStar CORP (SATS) and Yum! Brands (YUM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

EchoStar CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8B vs $2.5B, roughly 1.5× Yum! Brands). Yum! Brands runs the higher net margin — 21.3% vs -31.8%, a 53.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Yum! Brands posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.5% vs -4.3%). Yum! Brands produced more free cash flow last quarter ($482.0M vs $-583.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Yum! Brands's revenue compounded faster (25.5% CAGR vs -2.8%).

EchoStar CORPSATSEarnings & Financial Report

Nasdaq · Communication Services · Communications Services, NEC

TiVo Inc. v. EchoStar Corp. is a case stretching from 2004 to 2011, which took place in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. TiVo Inc. sued EchoStar Corp. claiming patent infringement of a DVR technology. The issues addressed during litigation included patent infringement, wording of injunctions, infringing product redesign, contempt of court orders, and contempt sanctions. Ultimately, the court held...

Yum! BrandsYUMEarnings & Financial Report

NYSE · Consumer Discretionary · Restaurants

Yum! Brands, Inc. is an American multinational fast food corporation. It was formed in 1977 as a subsidiary of PepsiCo, after the company acquired KFC, Pizza Hut, and Taco Bell. PepsiCo divested the brands in 1997, and these consolidated as Yum!. The company operates KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, Habit Burger & Grill, and several technology companies.

SATS vs YUM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue

SATS

1.5× larger

$3.8B

$2.5B

Growing faster (revenue YoY)

YUM

+10.8% gap

6.5%

-4.3%

Higher net margin

YUM

53.1% more per $

21.3%

-31.8%

More free cash flow

YUM

$1.1B more FCF

$482.0M

$-583.4M

Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR

YUM

Annualised

25.5%

-2.8%

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric	SATS	YUM
Revenue	$3.8B	$2.5B
Net Profit	$-1.2B	$535.0M
Gross Margin	—	67.6%
Operating Margin	-20.5%	29.3%
Net Margin	-31.8%	21.3%
Revenue YoY	-4.3%	6.5%
Net Profit YoY	-460.1%	26.5%
EPS (diluted)	$-4.27	$1.91

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue

SATS

YUM

Q4 25	$3.8B	$2.5B
Q3 25	$3.6B	$2.0B
Q2 25	$3.7B	$1.9B
Q1 25	$3.9B	$1.8B
Q4 24	$4.0B	$2.4B
Q3 24	$3.9B	$1.8B
Q2 24	$4.0B	$1.8B
Q1 24	$4.0B	$1.6B

Net Profit

SATS

YUM

Q4 25	$-1.2B	$535.0M
Q3 25	$-12.8B	$397.0M
Q2 25	$-306.1M	$374.0M
Q1 25	$-202.7M	$253.0M
Q4 24	$335.2M	$423.0M
Q3 24	$-141.8M	$382.0M
Q2 24	$-205.6M	$367.0M
Q1 24	$-107.4M	$314.0M

Gross Margin

SATS

YUM

Q4 25	—	67.6%
Q3 25	—	70.3%
Q2 25	—	71.0%
Q1 25	—	70.9%
Q4 24	—	69.2%
Q3 24	—	71.4%
Q2 24	—	73.3%
Q1 24	—	75.0%

Operating Margin

SATS

YUM

Q4 25	-20.5%	29.3%
Q3 25	-460.5%	33.7%
Q2 25	-5.7%	32.2%
Q1 25	-2.3%	30.7%
Q4 24	-1.6%	27.8%
Q3 24	-4.1%	33.9%
Q2 24	-1.7%	34.4%
Q1 24	-0.4%	32.5%

Net Margin

SATS

YUM

Q4 25	-31.8%	21.3%
Q3 25	-353.6%	20.1%
Q2 25	-8.2%	19.3%
Q1 25	-5.2%	14.2%
Q4 24	8.5%	17.9%
Q3 24	-3.6%	20.9%
Q2 24	-5.2%	20.8%
Q1 24	-2.7%	19.6%

EPS (diluted)

SATS

YUM

Q4 25	$-4.27	$1.91
Q3 25	$-44.37	$1.41
Q2 25	$-1.06	$1.33
Q1 25	$-0.71	$0.90
Q4 24	$1.24	$1.49
Q3 24	$-0.52	$1.35
Q2 24	$-0.76	$1.28
Q1 24	$-0.40	$1.10

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric	SATS	YUM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand	$3.0B	$709.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger	$18.7B	$11.9B
Stockholders' EquityBook value	$5.8B	$-7.3B
Total Assets	$43.0B	$8.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage	3.24×	—

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments

SATS

YUM

Q4 25	$3.0B	$709.0M
Q3 25	$3.9B	$1.0B
Q2 25	$4.3B	$677.0M
Q1 25	$5.1B	$607.0M
Q4 24	$5.5B	$707.0M
Q3 24	$674.4M	$548.0M
Q2 24	$520.6M	$520.0M
Q1 24	$766.4M	$652.0M

Total Debt

SATS

YUM

Q4 25	$18.7B	$11.9B
Q3 25	$21.8B	$11.5B
Q2 25	$25.4B	$10.4B
Q1 25	$25.3B	$11.3B
Q4 24	$25.7B	$11.3B
Q3 24	—	$11.2B
Q2 24	—	$11.1B
Q1 24	$951.0M	$11.1B

Stockholders' Equity

SATS

YUM

Q4 25	$5.8B	$-7.3B
Q3 25	$7.0B	$-7.5B
Q2 25	$19.7B	$-7.7B
Q1 25	$20.0B	$-7.8B
Q4 24	$20.2B	$-7.6B
Q3 24	$19.4B	$-7.7B
Q2 24	$19.6B	$-7.6B
Q1 24	$19.8B	$-7.8B

Total Assets

SATS

YUM

Q4 25	$43.0B	$8.2B
Q3 25	$45.3B	$7.2B
Q2 25	$59.9B	$6.9B
Q1 25	$60.6B	$6.7B
Q4 24	$60.9B	$6.7B
Q3 24	$57.5B	$6.5B
Q2 24	$55.3B	$6.4B
Q1 24	$55.6B	$6.2B

Debt / Equity

SATS

YUM

Q4 25	3.24×	—
Q3 25	3.13×	—
Q2 25	1.29×	—
Q1 25	1.27×	—
Q4 24	1.27×	—
Q3 24	—	—
Q2 24	—	—
Q1 24	0.05×	—

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric	SATS	YUM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter	$-425.3M	$617.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex	$-583.4M	$482.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue	-15.4%	19.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue	4.2%	5.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit	—	1.15×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters	$-1.1B	$1.6B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow

SATS

YUM

Q4 25	$-425.3M	$617.0M
Q3 25	$111.7M	$543.0M
Q2 25	$7.5M	$446.0M
Q1 25	$206.8M	$404.0M
Q4 24	$45.6M	$513.0M
Q3 24	$276.2M	$471.0M
Q2 24	$479.7M	$342.0M
Q1 24	$451.3M	$363.0M

Free Cash Flow

SATS

YUM

Q4 25	$-583.4M	$482.0M
Q3 25	$-144.4M	$449.0M
Q2 25	$-285.7M	$375.0M
Q1 25	$-51.7M	$333.0M
Q4 24	$-298.7M	$407.0M
Q3 24	$-57.5M	$419.0M
Q2 24	$132.4M	$292.0M
Q1 24	$-68.4M	$314.0M

FCF Margin

SATS

YUM

Q4 25	-15.4%	19.2%
Q3 25	-4.0%	22.7%
Q2 25	-7.7%	19.4%
Q1 25	-1.3%	18.6%
Q4 24	-7.5%	17.2%
Q3 24	-1.5%	22.9%
Q2 24	3.3%	16.6%
Q1 24	-1.7%	19.6%

Capex Intensity

SATS

YUM

Q4 25	4.2%	5.4%
Q3 25	7.1%	4.7%
Q2 25	7.9%	3.7%
Q1 25	6.7%	4.0%
Q4 24	8.7%	4.5%
Q3 24	8.6%	2.8%
Q2 24	8.8%	2.8%
Q1 24	12.9%	3.1%

Cash Conversion

SATS

YUM

Q4 25	—	1.15×
Q3 25	—	1.37×
Q2 25	—	1.19×
Q1 25	—	1.60×
Q4 24	0.14×	1.21×
Q3 24	—	1.23×
Q2 24	—	0.93×
Q1 24	—	1.16×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

SATS

Pay Tv	$2.4B	62%
Wireless Services And Related Revenue	$846.5M	22%
Equipment Sales And Other Revenue	$346.5M	9%
Broadband And Satellite Services And Other Revenue	$264.1M	7%