vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Smith Douglas Homes Corp. (SDHC) and INTERFACE INC (TILE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INTERFACE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($349.4M vs $260.4M, roughly 1.3× Smith Douglas Homes Corp.). INTERFACE INC runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs 1.4%, a 5.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INTERFACE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.3% vs -9.4%). INTERFACE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($28.6M vs $8.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Smith Douglas Homes Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (17.3% CAGR vs 9.8%).
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (S&W) is an American firearm manufacturer headquartered in Maryville, Tennessee, United States.
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
SDHC vs TILE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $260.4M | $349.4M |
| Net Profit | $3.5M | $24.4M |
| Gross Margin | 19.9% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | 6.5% | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | 1.4% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.4% | 4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.3% | 12.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.39 | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $260.4M | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $262.0M | $364.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $223.9M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $224.7M | $297.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $287.5M | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $277.8M | $344.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $220.9M | $346.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $189.2M | $289.7M |
| Q4 25 | $3.5M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $22.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0M | $14.2M |
| Q4 25 | 19.9% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.2% | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.8% | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.5% | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.5% | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.7% | 35.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.1% | 38.1% |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.2% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.3% | 8.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 4.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.39 | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.24 | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.26 | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.58 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.40 | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.33 | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $12.7M | $71.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $181.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $86.7M | $640.7M |
| Total Assets | $557.6M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $12.7M | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.8M | $187.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.8M | $121.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.7M | $97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.4M | $99.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.7M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.3M | $94.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.8M | $89.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $302.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $302.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $337.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $387.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $391.8M |
| Q4 25 | $86.7M | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.2M | $621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.0M | $575.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.9M | $513.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.6M | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.4M | $501.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.1M | $451.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.7M | $428.5M |
| Q4 25 | $557.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $571.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $570.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $513.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $475.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $460.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $429.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $401.3M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.91× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.8M | $49.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.7M | $28.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.4% | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.77× | 2.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-36.9M | $121.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.8M | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.8M | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.9M | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-34.9M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5M | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.9M | $76.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.0K | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.3M | $12.6M |
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.4M | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-31.1M | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-35.9M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $69.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.1M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.7M | $8.6M |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.9% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.1% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.77× | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.70× | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.24× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.01× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.33× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.28× | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.01× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.12× | 0.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SDHC
| Southeast | $164.7M | 63% |
| Central | $95.8M | 37% |
TILE
| AMS | $205.9M | 59% |
| EAAA | $143.5M | 41% |
