vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Smith Douglas Homes Corp. (SDHC) and UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC (UTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Smith Douglas Homes Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($260.4M vs $220.8M, roughly 1.2× UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC). UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs 1.4%, a 4.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.6% vs -9.4%). Smith Douglas Homes Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.7M vs $-19.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Smith Douglas Homes Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (17.3% CAGR vs 9.5%).
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (S&W) is an American firearm manufacturer headquartered in Maryville, Tennessee, United States.
Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is a private for-profit system of technical colleges in the United States. It was established in 1965 by Robert Sweet.
SDHC vs UTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $260.4M | $220.8M |
| Net Profit | $3.5M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | 19.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 6.5% | 7.1% |
| Net Margin | 1.4% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.4% | 9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.3% | -42.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.39 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $260.4M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $262.0M | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $223.9M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $224.7M | $207.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $287.5M | $201.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $277.8M | $196.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $220.9M | $177.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $189.2M | $184.2M |
| Q4 25 | $3.5M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $22.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0M | $7.8M |
| Q4 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.2% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.3% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.39 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.24 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.26 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.58 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.40 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.33 | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $12.7M | $162.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $101.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $86.7M | $335.9M |
| Total Assets | $557.6M | $834.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.30× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $12.7M | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.8M | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.8M | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.7M | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.4M | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.7M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.3M | $115.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.8M | $116.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $94.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $125.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $137.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $141.9M |
| Q4 25 | $86.7M | $335.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.2M | $328.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.0M | $306.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.9M | $293.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.6M | $280.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.4M | $260.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.1M | $239.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.7M | $232.6M |
| Q4 25 | $557.6M | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $571.6M | $826.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $570.2M | $740.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $513.9M | $720.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $475.9M | $753.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $460.1M | $744.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $429.3M | $706.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $401.3M | $702.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.61× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.8M | $3.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.7M | $-19.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.4% | -8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 10.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.77× | 0.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-36.9M | $16.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.8M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.8M | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.9M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-34.9M | $-789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.9M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.0K | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.3M | $-2.5M |
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.4M | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-31.1M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-35.9M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.1M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.7M | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.0% | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.1% | -4.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | 2.77× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.70× | 3.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.24× | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.01× | -0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.33× | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.28× | 3.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.01× | 2.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.12× | -0.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SDHC
| Southeast | $164.7M | 63% |
| Central | $95.8M | 37% |
UTI
| UTI | $142.8M | 65% |
| Concorde | $78.0M | 35% |
