vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (SEDG) and Vroom, Inc. (VRM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($335.4M vs $235.9M, roughly 1.4× Vroom, Inc.). SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — -39.4% vs -59.8%, a 20.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (70.9% vs 12.9%). SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($43.3M vs $-108.8M). Over the past eight quarters, SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (28.1% CAGR vs -49.5%).
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. is an Israeli company that developed a DC optimized inverter system.
Vroom, Inc. is a parent company of United Auto Credit Corporation (UACC) and CarStory. Previously, Vroom was a used car retailer and e-commerce company that let consumers buy, sell, and finance cars online. Vroom ceased e-commerce automotive sales operations on January 22, 2024.
SEDG vs VRM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2023
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $335.4M | $235.9M |
| Net Profit | $-132.1M | $-141.1M |
| Gross Margin | 22.2% | 12.3% |
| Operating Margin | -14.4% | -11.5% |
| Net Margin | -39.4% | -59.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 70.9% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 54.0% | -669.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.21 | $-80.66 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $335.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $340.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $289.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $219.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $196.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $235.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $265.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $204.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-132.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-50.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-124.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-98.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-287.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-130.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-157.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -57.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -309.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -12.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -14.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -39.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -46.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -134.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -471.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -60.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -85.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -39.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -43.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -44.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -146.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -522.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -49.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -77.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-2.21 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.84 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.13 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.70 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.00 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-21.58 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.31 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.75 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $493.2M | $135.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $454.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $427.5M | $127.7M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.56× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $493.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $498.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $758.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $651.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $585.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $678.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $689.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $680.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $427.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $479.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $513.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $594.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $658.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $930.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $52.6M | $-108.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $43.3M | $-108.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 12.9% | -46.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.8% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $80.8M | $-536.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $52.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-89.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-44.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-217.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $43.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-136.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-67.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-243.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -58.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -119.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.9% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SEDG
| Other | $197.7M | 59% |
| Europe Except Netherlands | $99.4M | 30% |
| Others | $38.2M | 11% |
VRM
Segment breakdown not available.
