vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SEALED AIR CORP (SEE) and Snap-on (SNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SEALED AIR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.1× Snap-on). Snap-on runs the higher net margin — 21.3% vs 3.1%, a 18.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Snap-on posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.7% vs 2.6%). SEALED AIR CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($257.7M vs $254.6M). Over the past eight quarters, SEALED AIR CORP's revenue compounded faster (2.7% CAGR vs 2.0%).
Sealed Air Corporation is a global provider of innovative packaging and protective solutions. Its core offerings include cushioning materials, food safety and preservation packaging, and sustainable waste-reducing packaging systems, serving retail, e-commerce, food and beverage, and industrial manufacturing markets worldwide.
Snap-on Incorporated is an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer of high-end tools and equipment for professional use in the transportation industry, including the automotive, heavy duty, equipment, marine, aviation, and railroad industries. Headquartered in Kenosha, Wisconsin, since 1930, Snap-on also distributes lower-end tools under the brand name Blue-Point. Their primary competitors include Matco, Mac Tools, and Cornwell Tools.
SEE vs SNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $43.8M | $260.7M |
| Gross Margin | 28.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.4% | 27.8% |
| Net Margin | 3.1% | 21.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 700.0% | 1.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.30 | $4.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $43.8M | $260.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.1M | $265.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.1M | $250.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $113.5M | $240.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.3M | $258.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.7M | $251.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.3M | $271.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $82.0M | $263.5M |
| Q4 25 | 28.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 11.4% | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.8% | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | 28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.9% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.4% | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.0% | 28.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | 21.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.0% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.5% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 23.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.2% | 22.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.30 | $4.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.73 | $5.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.63 | $4.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.77 | $4.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.05 | $4.83 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.63 | $4.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.67 | $5.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.56 | $4.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $344.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | — |
| Total Assets | $7.0B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.65× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $344.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $282.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $354.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $335.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $371.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $386.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $388.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $352.8M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $953.1M | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $797.9M | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $624.5M | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $771.2M | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $650.1M | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $598.3M | $5.1B |
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1B | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0B | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0B | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3B | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.2B | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | 2.65× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.34× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.18× | 0.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.26× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.72× | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.62× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.81× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.49× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $293.6M | $268.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $257.7M | $254.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.5% | 20.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.6% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.70× | 1.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $458.5M | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $293.6M | $268.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $165.9M | $277.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $136.6M | $237.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.9M | $298.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $244.2M | $293.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $170.5M | $274.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $188.2M | $301.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.1M | $348.7M |
| Q4 25 | $257.7M | $254.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.6M | $258.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.2M | $217.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.0M | $275.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $185.1M | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | $253.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $129.5M | $277.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $78.0M | $326.9M |
| Q4 25 | 18.5% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.9% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.6% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.9% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.6% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 6.70× | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | 1.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.47× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.28× | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.86× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.91× | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.53× | 1.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SEE
| Protective Segment | $1.1B | 78% |
| Other | $292.0M | 21% |
| Pension Plans Defined Benefit | $7.9M | 1% |
SNA
Segment breakdown not available.
