vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Seaport Entertainment Group Inc. (SEG) and Vitesse Energy, Inc. (VTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Vitesse Energy, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($58.6M vs $29.5M, roughly 2.0× Seaport Entertainment Group Inc.). Vitesse Energy, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1.3% vs -125.0%, a 123.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Vitesse Energy, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered independent energy company focused on exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas assets. It operates primarily in high-potential onshore basins including North Dakota's Williston Basin, serving domestic and global upstream energy market demand.
SEG vs VTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $29.5M | $58.6M |
| Net Profit | $-36.9M | $-739.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -120.5% | -12.0% |
| Net Margin | -125.0% | -1.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 4.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 85.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.90 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $29.5M | $58.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.0M | $67.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.8M | $81.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.1M | $66.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $55.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.4M | $58.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.7M | $66.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $61.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-36.9M | $-739.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-33.2M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.8M | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-31.9M | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.5M | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-35.0M | $10.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.2M |
| Q4 25 | -120.5% | -12.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -75.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -40.2% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -203.5% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -51.0% | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -75.3% | 25.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 21.4% |
| Q4 25 | -125.0% | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -73.7% | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -37.1% | 30.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -198.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -82.5% | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -103.9% | 16.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.90 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.61 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.16 | $0.60 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.51 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.89 | $0.53 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.34 | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $77.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $38.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $456.5M | $629.3M |
| Total Assets | $650.1M | $893.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.08× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $77.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $129.9M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $38.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $101.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $103.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $456.5M | $629.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $485.8M | $650.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $517.9M | $671.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $531.2M | $667.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $500.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $433.8M | $520.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $380.7M | $518.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $522.7M |
| Q4 25 | $650.1M | $893.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $699.1M | $932.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $717.2M | $951.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $718.4M | $975.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $810.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $622.8M | $791.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $610.1M | $778.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $749.7M |
| Q4 25 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-23.1M | $37.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-23.1M | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.3M | $49.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-754.0K | $66.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.5M | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $34.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.8M | $45.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $35.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $39.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SEG
| Sponsorships Events And Entertainment | $12.5M | 43% |
| Hospitality | $12.2M | 41% |
| Rental | $4.1M | 14% |
| Other | $631.0K | 2% |
VTS
| Oil Reserves | $54.5M | 93% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $4.2M | 7% |
