vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Stitch Fix, Inc. (SFIX) and Trinseo PLC (TSE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Trinseo PLC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($662.6M vs $342.1M, roughly 1.9× Stitch Fix, Inc.). Stitch Fix, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1.9% vs -37.9%, a 36.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Stitch Fix, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.3% vs -19.3%). Trinseo PLC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($6.6M vs $5.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Stitch Fix, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (1.8% CAGR vs -14.4%).
Stitch Fix, Inc. is an online personal styling service in the United States. It uses recommendation algorithms and data science to personalize clothing items based on size, budget and style. The company was founded in 2011 and had an initial public offering in 2017 with a valuation of $1.6 billion. Stitch Fix generated $1.6 billion in net revenue in its fiscal year 2023, a decrease of 21% year-over-year and reported 3,297,000 active clients in September 2023. It is headquartered in San Franci...
Trinseo is a company focusing particularly on the manufacture of plastics and latex binders. Trinseo was part of the Dow Chemical Company until Dow grouped several of its businesses for potential sale in 2009. In 2010, under the name Styron, those holdings were sold to private equity firm Bain Capital for $1.63 billion. As of 2016, Bain sold all of its stock in Trinseo, grossing $1.69 billion for 37,269,567 shares, resulting in Trinseo's “full independence as a public company.”
SFIX vs TSE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $342.1M | $662.6M |
| Net Profit | $-6.4M | $-251.4M |
| Gross Margin | 43.6% | 4.2% |
| Operating Margin | -2.5% | -24.7% |
| Net Margin | -1.9% | -37.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.3% | -19.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1.7% | -113.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.05 | $-7.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $342.1M | $662.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $311.2M | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $325.0M | $784.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $312.1M | $784.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.8M | $821.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $319.6M | $867.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $322.7M | $920.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $330.4M | $904.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.4M | $-251.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.6M | $-109.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.4M | $-105.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.5M | $-79.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.3M | $-117.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-36.5M | $-87.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.3M | $-67.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-35.5M | $-75.5M |
| Q4 25 | 43.6% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.6% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.2% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.5% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.4% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.6% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.5% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.4% | 6.7% |
| Q4 25 | -2.5% | -24.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.6% | -3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.0% | -4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.9% | -3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | -5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -13.1% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.5% | -0.4% |
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | -37.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.8% | -14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.3% | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.1% | -10.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.0% | -14.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.4% | -10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.6% | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.8% | -8.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.05 | $-7.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.06 | $-3.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | $-2.95 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $-2.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.05 | $-3.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.29 | $-2.47 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.18 | $-1.92 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.30 | $-2.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $244.2M | $146.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $204.1M | $-1.1B |
| Total Assets | $530.7M | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $244.2M | $146.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $234.9M | $112.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $234.2M | $137.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $219.1M | $126.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $253.3M | $209.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $247.0M | $165.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $244.5M | $105.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $229.8M | $166.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | $204.1M | $-1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $203.0M | $-861.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.4M | $-750.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.8M | $-679.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $190.5M | $-619.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $187.0M | $-480.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $208.9M | $-413.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $213.3M | $-348.0M |
| Q4 25 | $530.7M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $484.7M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $472.6M | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $507.1M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $486.9M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $537.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $538.3M | $3.0B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $10.9M | $22.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $5.6M | $6.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.6% | 1.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | 2.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.9M | $-153.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.9M | $22.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0M | $-21.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.5M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.2M | $-110.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.3M | $85.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.2M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.7M | $-41.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-22.3M | $-66.2M |
| Q4 25 | $5.6M | $6.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8M | $-38.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.0M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-19.4M | $-118.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.9M | $63.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.9M | $-56.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-26.1M | $-81.9M |
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | -0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.2% | -15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.9% | -9.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | 1.7% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SFIX
Segment breakdown not available.
TSE
| Other | $325.2M | 49% |
| Asia Pacific | $142.2M | 21% |
| Engineered Materials | $105.0M | 16% |
| Latex | $59.9M | 9% |
| Polymer Solutions | $30.3M | 5% |
