vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Singularity Future Technology Ltd. (SGLY) and Sharps Technology Inc. (STSS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Singularity Future Technology Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($147.6K vs $83.6K, roughly 1.8× Sharps Technology Inc.). Singularity Future Technology Ltd. runs the higher net margin — -451.2% vs -125963.6%, a 125512.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sharps Technology Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (217.9% vs -68.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Sharps Technology Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (44.4% CAGR vs -42.5%).
Singularity Education Group is an American company that offers executive educational programs, a business incubator, and business consultancy services. Although the company uses the word "university" in its branding, it is not an accredited university and has no academic programs or accreditation.
Sharps Rifle Manufacturing Company was the manufacturer of the Sharps Rifle. The company was organized by Samuel Robbins and Richard S. Lawrence as a holding company in Hartford, Connecticut, on October 9, 1851 with $100,000 in capital. Despite Sharps departing from the company bearing his name, Sharps Rifle Manufacturing Company produced over 100,000 rifles, but it dissolved in 1881 with the widespread use of repeating rifles.
SGLY vs STSS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $147.6K | $83.6K |
| Net Profit | $-665.9K | $-105.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | -1398.7% |
| Operating Margin | -407.0% | -122747.9% |
| Net Margin | -451.2% | -125963.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -68.9% | 217.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -103.1% | -6151.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | $-4.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $147.6K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.9K | $83.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | $474.1K | $222.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $363.1K | $-627.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $474.6K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $501.4K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $832.9K | $5.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | $446.6K | $19.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-665.9K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.5M | $-105.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-952.5K | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | $1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-327.8K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-961.8K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-918.8K | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-949.8K | $-982.4K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | -1398.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | -463.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 83.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -54.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -59.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -407.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -183.5% | -122747.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.0% | -1349.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -325.5% | 322.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -144.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -204.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -115.4% | -36329.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -313.2% | -9693.8% |
| Q4 25 | -451.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3077.1% | -125963.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -200.9% | 1598.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -460.1% | -307.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -69.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -191.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -110.3% | -39756.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -212.7% | -5164.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.25 | $-4.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.24 | $3.58 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.46 | $38.62 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.27 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.54 | $-643.64 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.32 | $-347.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $10.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.7M | $433.2M |
| Total Assets | $21.6M | $444.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2M |
| Q4 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1M | $433.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.5M | $14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.6M | $10.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.3M | $6.9M |
| Q4 25 | $21.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.6M | $444.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.2M | $17.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.4M | $18.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.7M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-8.6M | $-7.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-8.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -10559.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1724.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-16.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-8.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.3M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-745.2K | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $407.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.1K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.0K | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $-1.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-8.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -10559.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1694.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 405.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -31313.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -9946.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1724.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 839.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 312.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 15.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
