vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO (SHEN) and STRATASYS LTD. (SSYS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STRATASYS LTD. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($137.0M vs $91.6M, roughly 1.5× SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO). SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO runs the higher net margin — -5.9% vs -40.6%, a 34.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.2% vs -2.2%). STRATASYS LTD. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.5M vs $-78.6M). Over the past eight quarters, SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO's revenue compounded faster (15.0% CAGR vs -7.4%).
Shenandoah Telecommunications Co is a U.S. regional telecom provider offering broadband internet, wireless voice/data services, digital cable TV, and fiber-optic solutions. It serves residential, small business and enterprise clients across Mid-Atlantic states, focusing on underserved rural and suburban markets in Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland and Pennsylvania.
Stratasys, Ltd. is an American-Israeli manufacturer of 3D printers, software, and materials for polymer additive manufacturing as well as 3D-printed parts on-demand. The company is incorporated in Israel. Engineers use Stratasys systems to model complex geometries in a wide range of polymer materials, including: ABS, polyphenylsulfone (PPSF), polycarbonate (PC), polyetherimide and Nylon 12.
SHEN vs SSYS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $91.6M | $137.0M |
| Net Profit | $-5.4M | $-55.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | -1.0% | -16.6% |
| Net Margin | -5.9% | -40.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.2% | -2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -95.8% | -109.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.13 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $91.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.8M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.6M | $138.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $87.9M | $136.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.6M | $140.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $85.8M | $138.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.2M | $144.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-5.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.4M | $-55.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.0M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.1M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.3M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.9M | $-25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $214.7M | $-26.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 44.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.4% |
| Q4 25 | -1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.0% | -16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.3% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.9% | -9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.8% | -18.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.5% | -18.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.0% | -17.0% |
| Q4 25 | -5.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.5% | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.2% | -12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.4% | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | -19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -15.0% | -18.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 310.0% | -18.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.19 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.34 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.24 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.25 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $27.3M | $71.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $642.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $880.8M | $852.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.9B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.73× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.6M | $71.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.1M | $71.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $87.5M | $70.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.1M | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.8M | $70.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $389.7M | $91.1M |
| Q4 25 | $642.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $535.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $513.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $515.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $418.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $345.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $297.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $298.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $880.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $892.7M | $852.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $902.0M | $902.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $910.5M | $784.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $918.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $925.4M | $831.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $933.1M | $850.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $871.6M | $866.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.34× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $28.8M | $6.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-78.6M | $2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -85.8% | 1.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 117.2% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-257.9M | $-11.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.5M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.3M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.2M | $7.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-78.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-51.4M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-65.3M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-62.7M | $789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-72.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-51.3M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-78.3M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-54.9M | $5.0M |
| Q4 25 | -85.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -57.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.7% | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -71.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -84.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -58.5% | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -91.3% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -79.3% | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | 117.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 91.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 97.3% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 94.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 108.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 86.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 94.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 101.2% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.07× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SHEN
| Residential And SMB Incumbent Broadband | $41.5M | 45% |
| Residential And SMB Glo Fiber Expansion Markets | $23.0M | 25% |
| Commercial Fiber | $20.3M | 22% |
| RLEC Other | $6.8M | 7% |
SSYS
Segment breakdown not available.
