vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Sidus Space Inc. (SIDU) and Sintx Technologies, Inc. (SINT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sidus Space Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($366.0K vs $290.0K, roughly 1.3× Sintx Technologies, Inc.). Sintx Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -763.8% vs -3115.2%, a 2351.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sidus Space Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-16.2% vs -46.5%). Sintx Technologies, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-2.4M vs $-6.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Sintx Technologies, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-35.0% CAGR vs -43.8%).
Sidus Space Inc is a U.S.-headquartered space technology and services provider specializing in small satellite design, manufacturing and operation. It offers end-to-end space solutions including data analytics, on-orbit servicing and custom hardware for commercial, government and academic clients worldwide, supporting various space mission objectives.
Sintx Technologies, Inc. is an advanced materials company specializing in R&D and manufacturing of high-performance silicon nitride and other technical ceramic products. It serves key segments including medical implants, aerospace & defense, industrial wear components, and electric vehicle applications, with core markets across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.
SIDU vs SINT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $366.0K | $290.0K |
| Net Profit | $-11.4M | $-2.2M |
| Gross Margin | -474.9% | 64.8% |
| Operating Margin | -3009.2% | -799.3% |
| Net Margin | -3115.2% | -763.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -16.2% | -46.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -100.9% | -30.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.29 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $366.0K | $290.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $559.1K | $208.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $691.1K | $151.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $369.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.5K | $542.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8M | $799.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $834.8K | $859.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $845.1K | $687.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-11.4M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.0M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.6M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.7M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.9M | $-6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.1M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.8M | $-886.0K |
| Q4 25 | -474.9% | 64.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -232.3% | 44.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -148.6% | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -171.8% | 71.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 73.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -100.8% | 73.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.9% | 67.5% |
| Q4 25 | -3009.2% | -799.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1007.2% | -1613.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -765.5% | -1764.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -645.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1165.4% | -319.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -180.5% | -802.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -466.9% | -315.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -421.4% | -465.4% |
| Q4 25 | -3115.2% | -763.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1079.2% | -1701.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -814.0% | -1535.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -621.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1300.0% | -312.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -222.1% | -780.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -495.5% | -256.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -450.9% | -129.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.29 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.24 | $-3.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.31 | $-0.91 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.26 | $17.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.93 | $-6.96 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.99 | $-3.61 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.42 | $-21.66 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $4.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $50.6M | $2.9M |
| Total Assets | $66.1M | $9.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.8M |
| Q4 25 | $50.6M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.3M | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.5M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3M | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.1M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.2M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $66.1M | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.9M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.7M | $9.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.7M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.1M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.8M | $15.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.4M | $17.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.1M | $-2.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-6.5M | $-2.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1768.6% | -822.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 651.5% | 14.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-28.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.1M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.2M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.5M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.7M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.2M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.4M | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.5M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.7M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.9M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.8M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.0M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.6M | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | -1768.6% | -822.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1369.2% | -1250.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -870.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -368.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1811.7% | -234.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -213.6% | -323.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -477.9% | -299.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -905.0% | -423.1% |
| Q4 25 | 651.5% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 256.8% | 40.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 199.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 543.4% | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 220.1% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 263.9% | 25.3% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.