vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Sintx Technologies, Inc. (SINT) and TREASURE GLOBAL INC (TGL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sintx Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($290.0K vs $182.5K, roughly 1.6× TREASURE GLOBAL INC). Sintx Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -763.8% vs -1169.1%, a 405.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TREASURE GLOBAL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-12.0% vs -46.5%). Sintx Technologies, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-2.4M vs $-2.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Sintx Technologies, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-35.0% CAGR vs -83.5%).
Sintx Technologies, Inc. is an advanced materials company specializing in R&D and manufacturing of high-performance silicon nitride and other technical ceramic products. It serves key segments including medical implants, aerospace & defense, industrial wear components, and electric vehicle applications, with core markets across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.
Treasure Global Inc is a consumer technology company offering integrated digital commerce solutions, customer loyalty rewards programs, and cashless payment services. It primarily operates across Southeast Asian markets, serving individual users and small-to-medium enterprise clients.
SINT vs TGL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $290.0K | $182.5K |
| Net Profit | $-2.2M | $-2.1M |
| Gross Margin | 64.8% | 0.7% |
| Operating Margin | -799.3% | -953.5% |
| Net Margin | -763.8% | -1169.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -46.5% | -12.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -30.7% | -124.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.50 | $-0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $290.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $208.0K | $182.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | $151.0K | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $369.0K | $666.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | $542.0K | $301.9K | ||
| Q3 24 | $799.0K | $207.4K | ||
| Q2 24 | $859.0K | $293.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $687.0K | $1.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.5M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.3M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.7M | $-232.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.2M | $-950.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-886.0K | $-1.7M |
| Q4 25 | 64.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.7% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.7% | 68.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.3% | 73.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 71.6% | 74.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.7% | 83.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 73.9% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 67.5% | 13.6% |
| Q4 25 | -799.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1613.0% | -953.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1764.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -645.8% | -6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -319.6% | -229.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -802.0% | -391.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -315.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -465.4% | -85.9% |
| Q4 25 | -763.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1701.4% | -1169.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1535.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -621.1% | 189.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -312.7% | -77.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -780.9% | -458.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -256.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -129.0% | -107.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.50 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.46 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.91 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.29 | $1.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.04 | $-11.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.96 | $-17.62 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.61 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-21.66 | $-116.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.9M | $12.0M |
| Total Assets | $9.5M | $16.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.5M | $2.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6M | $504.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8M | $44.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6M | $171.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.1M | $29.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9M | $18.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.8M | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.4M | $16.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $30.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4M | $19.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3M | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.3M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $4.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.3M | $-1.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.4M | $-2.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -822.8% | -1318.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 14.5% | 353.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.5M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.4M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1M | $-606.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.6M | $-976.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.2M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.4M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.9M | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | -822.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1250.5% | -1318.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -822.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -368.6% | -635.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -234.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -323.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -299.7% | -1614.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -423.1% | -67.1% |
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.4% | 353.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.8% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.3% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.36× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
