vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Sintx Technologies, Inc. (SINT) and ATIF Holdings Ltd (ZBAI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sintx Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($290.0K vs $250.0K, roughly 1.2× ATIF Holdings Ltd). ATIF Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — -635.6% vs -763.8%, a 128.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ATIF Holdings Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.0% vs -46.5%). Over the past eight quarters, ATIF Holdings Ltd's revenue compounded faster (-8.7% CAGR vs -35.0%).
Sintx Technologies, Inc. is an advanced materials company specializing in R&D and manufacturing of high-performance silicon nitride and other technical ceramic products. It serves key segments including medical implants, aerospace & defense, industrial wear components, and electric vehicle applications, with core markets across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.
ATIF Holdings Ltd is a professional business advisory service provider that mainly serves small and medium-sized enterprises across the Asia-Pacific region. It offers corporate strategic consulting, fundraising guidance, cross-border expansion support, and industry resource matching services for clients in technology, consumer goods, manufacturing and other key sectors.
SINT vs ZBAI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $290.0K | $250.0K |
| Net Profit | $-2.2M | $-1.6M |
| Gross Margin | 64.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -799.3% | -75.6% |
| Net Margin | -763.8% | -635.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -46.5% | 25.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -30.7% | -96.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.50 | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $290.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $208.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $151.0K | $250.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $369.0K | $200.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $542.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $799.0K | $270.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $859.0K | $200.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $687.0K | $25.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.3M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.2M | $-807.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-886.0K | $-407.6K |
| Q4 25 | 64.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 71.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 73.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 67.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -799.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1613.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1764.9% | -75.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -645.8% | -175.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -319.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -802.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -315.5% | -260.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -465.4% | -2190.1% |
| Q4 25 | -763.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1701.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1535.1% | -635.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -621.1% | -951.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -312.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -780.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -256.6% | -403.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -129.0% | -1630.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.50 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.46 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.91 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.29 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.04 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.96 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.61 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-21.66 | $-0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.1M | $7.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.9M | $8.4M |
| Total Assets | $9.5M | $8.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.3M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.5M | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.8M | $139.2K |
| Q4 25 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0M | $8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.1M | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.8M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $506.3K |
| Q4 25 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $8.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.3M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $2.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.3M | $-939.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -822.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 14.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.4M | $-939.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $-395.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.2M | $-62.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $-212.8K |
| Q4 25 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.9M | $-213.5K |
| Q4 25 | -822.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1250.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -368.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -234.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -323.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -299.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -423.1% | -854.1% |
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.3% | 3.0% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
