vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SITIME Corp (SITM) and Telesat Corp (TSAT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SITIME Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($113.6M vs $73.8M, roughly 1.5× Telesat Corp). Over the past eight quarters, SITIME Corp's revenue compounded faster (60.9% CAGR vs -64.0%).
SiTime Corporation is a publicly traded fabless chipmaker based in Santa Clara, California that develops micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS), used for timing devices in electronics.
Telesat, formerly Telesat Canada, is a Canadian satellite communications company founded on May 2, 1969. The company is headquartered in Ottawa.
SITM vs TSAT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $113.6M | $73.8M |
| Net Profit | — | $-88.4M |
| Gross Margin | 59.0% | 95.3% |
| Operating Margin | 30.2% | 5.9% |
| Net Margin | — | -119.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 88.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.20 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $113.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $113.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.6M | $73.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.5M | $77.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.3M | $152.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.9M | $363.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.0M | $-88.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.2M | $55.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.9M | $-52.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-26.8M | $547.4M |
| Q1 26 | 59.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 56.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.5% | 95.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | 95.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 51.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 30.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.4% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -46.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -33.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -73.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.6% | -119.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.0% | 71.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -39.6% | -34.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -33.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -61.0% | 150.7% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.20 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.31 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.84 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.01 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.80 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.83 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.16 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $498.5M | $352.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $498.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $352.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $399.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $552.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $692.5M | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $699.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $696.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $692.5M | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $872.1M | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $885.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $877.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $878.6M | $6.3B |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
