vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SITIME Corp (SITM) and TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC (TR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($196.3M vs $113.6M, roughly 1.7× SITIME Corp). On growth, SITIME Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (88.3% vs 1.5%). Over the past eight quarters, SITIME Corp's revenue compounded faster (60.9% CAGR vs 13.2%).
SiTime Corporation is a publicly traded fabless chipmaker based in Santa Clara, California that develops micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS), used for timing devices in electronics.
Tootsie Roll Industries is an American manufacturer of confectionery based in Chicago, Illinois. Its best-known products include the namesake Tootsie Rolls and Tootsie Pops. Tootsie Roll Industries currently markets its brands internationally in Canada, Mexico, and over 75 other countries.
SITM vs TR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $113.6M | $196.3M |
| Net Profit | — | $28.8M |
| Gross Margin | 59.0% | 35.7% |
| Operating Margin | 30.2% | 17.0% |
| Net Margin | — | 14.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 88.3% | 1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.20 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $113.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $113.3M | $196.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.6M | $232.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.5M | $155.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.3M | $148.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.1M | $193.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | $225.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.9M | $150.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.2M | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.0M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.2M | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.9M | $18.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.8M | $22.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.3M | $32.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-26.8M | $15.6M |
| Q1 26 | 59.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 56.4% | 35.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.5% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | 36.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.3% | 35.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.6% | 39.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 51.1% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.1% | 33.5% |
| Q1 26 | 30.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.2% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -46.6% | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -33.8% | 20.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.1% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -73.7% | 10.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.6% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.0% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -39.6% | 12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.6% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -33.5% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -61.0% | 10.4% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.20 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.31 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.84 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.01 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.80 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.83 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.16 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $498.5M | $176.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $941.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $498.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $176.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $119.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $170.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $176.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $194.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $163.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $131.2M |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $941.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $918.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $893.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $692.5M | $879.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $699.7M | $870.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $696.2M | $870.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $692.5M | $841.4M |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $872.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $885.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $877.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $878.6M | $1.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $73.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $61.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 31.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 6.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $96.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $25.4M | $73.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.4M | $62.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.5M | $68.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.2M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-181.0K | $-12.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.0M | $61.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.3M | $50.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $750.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.4M | $64.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.7M | $55.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.7M | $-16.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.5% | 31.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.5% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.2% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.5% | 33.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.6% | 24.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | -11.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.7% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 2.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.77× | 2.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.49× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.81× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SITM
Segment breakdown not available.
TR
| Products | $194.3M | 99% |
| Rental And Royalty | $1.9M | 1% |
