vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SITIME Corp (SITM) and Urban Edge Properties (UE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Urban Edge Properties is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($132.6M vs $113.6M, roughly 1.2× SITIME Corp). On growth, SITIME Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (88.3% vs 12.2%). Over the past eight quarters, SITIME Corp's revenue compounded faster (60.9% CAGR vs 11.6%).
SiTime Corporation is a publicly traded fabless chipmaker based in Santa Clara, California that develops micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS), used for timing devices in electronics.
Urban Edge Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and develops high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily located in densely populated urban and suburban markets across the United States. Its portfolio covers grocery-anchored shopping centers, lifestyle outlets, and community-focused commercial assets.
SITM vs UE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $113.6M | $132.6M |
| Net Profit | — | $22.6M |
| Gross Margin | 59.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 30.2% | — |
| Net Margin | — | 17.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 88.3% | 12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.20 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $113.6M | $132.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $113.3M | $119.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.6M | $120.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.5M | $114.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.3M | $118.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.1M | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | $112.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.9M | $106.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.2M | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.0M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.2M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.9M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.8M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.3M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-26.8M | $30.8M |
| Q1 26 | 59.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 56.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 51.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 30.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.2% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.4% | 53.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -46.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -33.8% | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.1% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -73.7% | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.6% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.0% | 50.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -39.6% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.6% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -33.5% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -61.0% | 28.9% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.20 | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.44 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.31 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.84 | $0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.01 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.80 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.83 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.16 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $498.5M | $50.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $498.5M | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $77.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $78.6M |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $692.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $699.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $696.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $692.5M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $872.1M | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $885.0M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $877.9M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $878.6M | $3.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $39.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $39.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $25.4M | $182.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.4M | $55.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3M | $43.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.5M | $153.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.2M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-181.0K | $41.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.0M | $81.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.3M | $26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.4M | $42.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.7M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.7M | $19.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.5% | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.5% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.2% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.5% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.6% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | 18.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 84.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.2% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.0% | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.3% | 95.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.7% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.77× | 14.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SITM
Segment breakdown not available.
UE
| Rental revenue | $124.2M | 94% |
| Other | $8.4M | 6% |
