vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SITIME Corp (SITM) and UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC (UTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($220.8M vs $113.3M, roughly 1.9× SITIME Corp). SITIME Corp runs the higher net margin — 8.1% vs 5.8%, a 2.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SITIME Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (66.3% vs 9.6%). SITIME Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($13.0M vs $-19.2M). Over the past eight quarters, SITIME Corp's revenue compounded faster (85.2% CAGR vs 9.5%).
SiTime Corporation is a publicly traded fabless chipmaker based in Santa Clara, California that develops micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS), used for timing devices in electronics.
Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is a private for-profit system of technical colleges in the United States. It was established in 1965 by Robert Sweet.
SITM vs UTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $113.3M | $220.8M |
| Net Profit | $9.2M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | 56.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.6% | 7.1% |
| Net Margin | 8.1% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 66.3% | 9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 148.7% | -42.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $113.3M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.6M | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.5M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.3M | $207.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.1M | $201.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | $196.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.9M | $177.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.0M | $184.2M |
| Q4 25 | $9.2M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.0M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.2M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.9M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.8M | $22.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.3M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-26.8M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-28.7M | $7.8M |
| Q4 25 | 56.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 51.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 53.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.2% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -46.6% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -33.8% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.1% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -73.7% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -106.1% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.6% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.0% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -39.6% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.6% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -33.5% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -61.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -86.9% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.44 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.31 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.84 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.01 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.80 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.83 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.16 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.26 | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $162.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $101.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $335.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $834.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.30× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $115.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $116.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $94.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $125.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $137.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $141.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $335.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $328.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $306.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $692.5M | $293.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $699.7M | $280.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $696.2M | $260.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $692.5M | $239.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $696.2M | $232.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $826.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $740.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $872.1M | $720.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $885.0M | $753.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $877.9M | $744.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $878.6M | $706.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $942.6M | $702.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.61× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $25.4M | $3.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $13.0M | $-19.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.5% | -8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 10.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.77× | 0.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $35.1M | $16.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $25.4M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.4M | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0M | $-789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.5M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.2M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-181.0K | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $-2.5M |
| Q4 25 | $13.0M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.3M | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.4M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.7M | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.7M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | 11.5% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.5% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.2% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.1% | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.5% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.6% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.6% | -4.6% |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.8% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | 2.77× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SITM
Segment breakdown not available.
UTI
| UTI | $142.8M | 65% |
| Concorde | $78.0M | 35% |
