vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TANGER INC. (SKT) and Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TANGER INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($150.4M vs $100.0M, roughly 1.5× Latham Group, Inc.). TANGER INC. runs the higher net margin — 19.6% vs -7.0%, a 26.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Latham Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.5% vs 11.1%). Over the past eight quarters, TANGER INC.'s revenue compounded faster (8.0% CAGR vs -4.9%).
Tanger Inc. is a real estate investment trust headquartered in Greensboro, North Carolina, that invests in open air outlet and lifestyle shopping centers in the United States and Canada.
Latham & Watkins LLP is an American multinational law firm. Founded in 1934 in Los Angeles, California, it is known for its litigation, corporate, and regulatory law practices.
SKT vs SWIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $150.4M | $100.0M |
| Net Profit | $29.4M | $-7.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -10.7% |
| Net Margin | 19.6% | -7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.1% | 14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 47.1% | 76.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.05 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $150.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $151.0M | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $145.2M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.7M | $172.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.4M | $111.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.2M | $87.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.0M | $150.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $129.0M | $160.1M |
| Q1 26 | $29.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.1M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.2M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-29.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.9M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.8M | $13.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.1% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.0% | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.8% | 12.5% |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.1% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.4% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.7% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.3% | 8.3% |
| Q1 26 | $1.05 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.28 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.26 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.22 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.22 | $0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $227.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $279.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $697.8M | $405.9M |
| Total Assets | $2.8B | $823.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $227.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $279.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $281.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $281.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $306.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $281.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $282.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $282.4M |
| Q1 26 | $697.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $405.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $703.6M | $408.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.2M | $398.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.9M | $381.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $652.4M | $387.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $568.3M | $416.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $553.7M | $408.1M |
| Q1 26 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $823.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $844.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $822.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $824.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $794.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $853.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $830.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.29× | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.40× | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.47× | 0.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.18× | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.51× | 0.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.64× | 0.69× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $23.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $14.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 14.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.6% | 9.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $38.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.3M | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $82.0M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.4M | $-46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.2M | $37.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.8M | $52.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $14.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-50.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-98.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.9% |
| Q1 26 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.32× | 6.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.73× | 2.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.16× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.62× | 6.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.93× | 3.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SKT
| Rental revenue | $143.5M | 95% |
| Other revenue | $4.7M | 3% |
| Management, leasing and other services | $2.2M | 1% |
SWIM
| In Ground Swimming Pools | $50.2M | 50% |
| Covers | $37.0M | 37% |
| Liners | $12.7M | 13% |
