vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG) and Velo3D, Inc. (VELO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Stabilis Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.3M vs $9.4M, roughly 1.4× Velo3D, Inc.). Stabilis Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -2.0% vs -231.9%, a 230.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Stabilis Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-23.3% vs -25.2%). Stabilis Solutions, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-2.5M vs $-8.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Velo3D, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-1.8% CAGR vs -18.1%).
Stabilis Solutions, Inc.SLNGEarnings & Financial Report
Stabilis Solutions, Inc. is a leading North American small-scale liquefied natural gas (LNG) producer and distributor. It supplies LNG fuel, cryogenic services, and full-cycle energy solutions to industrial, remote power, transportation, and commercial clients across the United States and Canada, advancing low-emission energy transition efforts.
Velo3D, Inc. develops and sells advanced end-to-end metal additive manufacturing (3D printing) solutions, comprising industrial-grade printers, specialized processing software, and high-performance metal materials. It primarily serves global aerospace, defense, energy, semiconductor and industrial manufacturing markets, enabling customers to produce complex, high-precision metal parts that are difficult to manufacture with traditional methods.
SLNG vs VELO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.3M | $9.4M |
| Net Profit | $-262.0K | $-21.9M |
| Gross Margin | 24.7% | -73.6% |
| Operating Margin | -2.4% | -231.0% |
| Net Margin | -2.0% | -231.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -23.3% | -25.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -112.4% | -2.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.3M | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3M | $13.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3M | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.3M | $12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.6M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6M | $10.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.8M | $9.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-262.0K | $-21.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-613.0K | $-13.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $-25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $-21.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $997.0K | $-21.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.0K | $935.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5M | $-27.5M |
| Q4 25 | 24.7% | -73.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.6% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.5% | -11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.2% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.5% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.3% | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.1% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.6% | -28.8% |
| Q4 25 | -2.4% | -231.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.5% | -73.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.4% | -85.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.7% | -123.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.8% | -167.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | -213.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | -187.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.8% | -211.1% |
| Q4 25 | -2.0% | -231.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.5% | -82.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | -97.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.2% | -268.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.2% | -168.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | -265.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.4% | -281.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $-0.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $-0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.09 | $-1.87 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.12 | $7.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.05 | $-35.52 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | $1.65 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.08 | $-55.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.5M | $39.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $7.9M | $31.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $66.7M | $38.2M |
| Total Assets | $83.1M | $105.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.12× | 0.81× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $7.5M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2M | $854.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.0M | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.4M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.3M | $10.9M |
| Q4 25 | $7.9M | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6M | $22.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3M | $21.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.9M | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3M | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.6M | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.1M | $44.0M |
| Q4 25 | $66.7M | $38.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.7M | $29.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.5M | $21.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.9M | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.0M | $39.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.4M | $34.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.7M | $52.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.2M | $45.5M |
| Q4 25 | $83.1M | $105.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.1M | $93.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.2M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.1M | $91.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.6M | $89.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $89.3M | $110.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.6M | $116.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $80.6M | $136.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.12× | 0.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.12× | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.12× | 1.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.13× | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.13× | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.14× | 0.94× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.13× | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.14× | 0.97× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $669.0K | $-7.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.5M | $-8.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -18.6% | -88.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 23.7% | 6.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $462.0K | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $669.0K | $-7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | $-12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9M | $-20.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.5M | $-8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $538.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.4M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | $-20.5M |
| Q4 25 | -18.6% | -88.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.3% | -46.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.4% | -22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -19.7% | -17.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | -24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.7% | -77.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.5% | -209.8% |
| Q4 25 | 23.7% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.14× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 186.59× | -8.52× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.67× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SLNG
| Natural Gas Gathering Transportation Marketing And Processing | $11.1M | 84% |
| Other | $1.3M | 10% |
| Services | $897.0K | 7% |
VELO
Segment breakdown not available.
