vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SM Energy Co (SM) and Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Snowflake Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $704.9M, roughly 1.8× SM Energy Co). On growth, Snowflake Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (100.0% vs -17.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Snowflake Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (24.5% CAGR vs 12.2%).
SM Energy Company is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Denver, Colorado.
Snowflake Inc. is an American cloud-based data platform company founded in San Mateo, California, and headquartered in Bozeman, Montana. It operates a platform that supports data analysis and simultaneous access to data sets with minimal latency. It operates on Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform.
SM vs SNOW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2027
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $704.9M | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | — | $-309.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 66.8% |
| Operating Margin | 25.9% | 8.4% |
| Net Margin | — | -24.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -17.3% | 100.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 5.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.94 | $-0.90 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $704.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $811.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $792.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $844.5M | $986.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $852.0M | $942.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $643.6M | $868.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $634.6M | $828.7M |
| Q4 26 | — | $-309.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-294.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.1M | $-298.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.7M | $-430.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.3M | $-327.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-324.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $-316.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $210.3M | $-317.0M |
| Q4 26 | — | 66.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 67.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 67.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 66.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 66.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 65.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 66.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 67.1% |
| Q4 26 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.9% | -27.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.4% | -29.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.2% | -42.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.7% | -39.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.7% | -38.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 51.4% | -40.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.0% | -42.1% |
| Q4 26 | — | -24.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -24.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | -26.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | -41.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.6% | -33.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -34.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.4% | -36.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.1% | -38.3% |
| Q4 26 | — | $-0.90 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.94 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.35 | $-0.89 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.76 | $-1.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.59 | $-0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.63 | $-0.98 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.09 | $-0.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.82 | $-0.95 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $368.0M | $4.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.8B | — |
| Total Assets | $9.3B | $9.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 26 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $368.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.3M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.9M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $54.0K | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $487.9M | $1.3B |
| Q4 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | $4.6B |
| Q4 26 | — | $9.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.3B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.1B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.0B | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.8B | $9.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.6B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.0B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7B | $7.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $451.9M | $781.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $765.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 59.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 26 | — | $781.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $451.9M | $137.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $505.0M | $74.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $571.1M | $228.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $483.0M | $432.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $578.4M | $101.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.3M | $69.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $476.4M | $355.5M |
| Q4 26 | — | $765.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $113.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $58.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $183.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $421.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $88.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $64.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $338.9M |
| Q4 26 | — | 59.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.9% |
| Q4 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.0% |
| Q4 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.26× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.83× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.65× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.88× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.27× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SM
Segment breakdown not available.
SNOW
| Product revenue | $1.2B | 96% |
| Other | $57.4M | 4% |