vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SM Energy Co (SM) and Verisign (VRSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SM Energy Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($704.9M vs $425.3M, roughly 1.7× Verisign). On growth, Verisign posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs -17.3%). Over the past eight quarters, SM Energy Co's revenue compounded faster (12.2% CAGR vs 5.2%).
SM Energy Company is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Denver, Colorado.
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains.
SM vs VRSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $704.9M | $425.3M |
| Net Profit | — | $206.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | 25.9% | 67.0% |
| Net Margin | — | 48.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -17.3% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.94 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $704.9M | $425.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $811.6M | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $792.9M | $409.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $844.5M | $402.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $852.0M | $395.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $643.6M | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $634.6M | $387.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $559.9M | $384.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $206.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.1M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.7M | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.3M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $201.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $210.3M | $198.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $131.2M | $194.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 88.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 88.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 88.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 87.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 87.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 88.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 87.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 87.2% |
| Q4 25 | 25.9% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.4% | 67.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.2% | 68.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.7% | 67.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.7% | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 51.4% | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.0% | 68.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.9% | 67.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.6% | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.4% | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.1% | 51.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.4% | 50.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.94 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.35 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.76 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.59 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.63 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.09 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.82 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.13 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $368.0M | $580.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.8B | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | $9.3B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $368.0M | $580.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.3M | $617.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.9M | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $54.0K | $648.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $599.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $487.9M | $689.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $506.3M | $924.7M |
| Q4 25 | $4.8B | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | $-2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | $-1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7B | $-1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $9.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4B | $1.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $451.9M | $289.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $285.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 67.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $451.9M | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $505.0M | $307.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $571.1M | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $483.0M | $291.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $578.4M | $231.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.3M | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $476.4M | $160.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $276.0M | $257.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $285.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $303.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $285.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $222.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $247.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $151.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $253.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 72.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 66.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.26× | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.83× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.65× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.88× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.27× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.10× | 1.33× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
