vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Summit Midstream Corp (SMC) and Twin Hospitality Group Inc. (TWNP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Summit Midstream Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($142.3M vs $82.3M, roughly 1.7× Twin Hospitality Group Inc.). Summit Midstream Corp runs the higher net margin — -5.1% vs -29.7%, a 24.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. Summit Midstream Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($34.5M vs $-7.4M).
Summit Midstream Corp is a North American midstream energy firm serving upstream oil and gas producers. It runs natural gas and crude gathering pipelines, compression facilities, and produced water handling services, with assets across key US onshore resource basins.
Target Hospitality is a company that provides workforce lodging and other temporary, modular housing used for oil, gas and mining operations; large-scale events; and disaster relief. Target Hospitality is based in The Woodlands, Texas, and also has offices in Williston, North Dakota; Denver, Colorado; Calgary, Alberta.
SMC vs TWNP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $142.3M | $82.3M |
| Net Profit | $-7.3M | $-24.5M |
| Gross Margin | 72.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -5.5% | -16.2% |
| Net Margin | -5.1% | -29.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.66 | $-0.43 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $142.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.9M | $82.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.2M | $87.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.7M | $87.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-7.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | $-24.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.0M | $-20.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $-12.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-204.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 72.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 74.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 74.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 73.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 72.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | -16.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.6% | -13.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -53.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -5.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.1% | -29.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.7% | -23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | -13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -200.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.66 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.13 | $-0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.66 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.25 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $9.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.0B | $402.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $546.2M | $-92.1M |
| Total Assets | $2.4B | $516.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.91× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $402.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $411.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $413.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $957.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $546.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $551.9M | $-92.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $552.0M | $-78.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $558.1M | $-101.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $651.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $516.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $535.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $544.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.91× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.96× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.95× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.94× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.47× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $53.7M | $-5.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $34.5M | $-7.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 24.3% | -9.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.4% | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $44.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $53.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.7M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.2M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.0M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $34.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.6M | $-9.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | -9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | -12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.4% | -11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.5% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.89× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SMC
| Rockies Segment | $86.2M | 61% |
| Mid Con Barnett Shale Segment | $39.4M | 28% |
| Piceance Basin Segment | $15.8M | 11% |
TWNP
Segment breakdown not available.
