vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SharkNinja, Inc. (SN) and Universal Health Services (UHS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SharkNinja, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.5B vs $4.5B, roughly 1.2× Universal Health Services). On growth, SharkNinja, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.0% vs 8.2%).
SharkNinja is a global product design and technology company based in Needham, Massachusetts. Founded in 1994 by Mark Rosenzweig and led by CEO Mark Barrocas, who joined the company in 2008 as president. The company's name is formed by combining its two primary brands: Shark and Ninja.
Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) is an American Fortune 500 company that provides hospital and healthcare services, based in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. In 2024, UHS reported total revenues of $15.8 billion.
SN vs UHS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.5B | $4.5B |
| Net Profit | — | $358.7M |
| Gross Margin | 48.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.7% | 11.2% |
| Net Margin | — | 8.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 30.0% | 8.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 11.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.11 | $5.65 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $358.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $445.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $373.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $353.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $316.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $332.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $258.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $289.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.65 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $7.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.86 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.43 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.80 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.11 | $4.94 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.80 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $363.7M | $119.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $7.5B |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $15.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $119.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $137.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $112.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $137.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $126.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $363.7M | $126.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $106.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $128.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $15.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $15.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $15.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | $14.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $14.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.69× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $446.6M | $401.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $308.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.5% | 4.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.12× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $401.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $574.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $380.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $549.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $360.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $446.6M | $658.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $333.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $679.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $293.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $151.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $283.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $121.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.9M | $412.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $85.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $437.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.12× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.55× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.35× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
