vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SenesTech, Inc. (SNES) and TREASURE GLOBAL INC (TGL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SenesTech, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($421.0K vs $182.5K, roughly 2.3× TREASURE GLOBAL INC). SenesTech, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -428.5% vs -1169.1%, a 740.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TREASURE GLOBAL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-12.0% vs -16.0%). SenesTech, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.7M vs $-2.4M). Over the past eight quarters, SenesTech, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (0.7% CAGR vs -83.5%).
SenesTech, Inc. is an agricultural biotechnology life-sciences company, specializing in fertility management as a form of pest control. The company's primary product, ContraPest is designed to make brown and black rats infertile. SenesTech is headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona.
Treasure Global Inc is a consumer technology company offering integrated digital commerce solutions, customer loyalty rewards programs, and cashless payment services. It primarily operates across Southeast Asian markets, serving individual users and small-to-medium enterprise clients.
SNES vs TGL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $421.0K | $182.5K |
| Net Profit | $-1.8M | $-2.1M |
| Gross Margin | 55.3% | 0.7% |
| Operating Margin | -446.8% | -953.5% |
| Net Margin | -428.5% | -1169.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -16.0% | -12.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -43.7% | -124.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.48 | $-0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $421.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $690.0K | $182.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | $625.0K | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $485.0K | $666.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | $501.0K | $301.9K | ||
| Q3 24 | $482.0K | $207.4K | ||
| Q2 24 | $459.0K | $293.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $415.0K | $1.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.3M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | $-232.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.5M | $-950.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.8M | $-1.7M |
| Q4 25 | 55.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 62.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.4% | 68.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 64.5% | 73.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.9% | 74.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 65.4% | 83.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.2% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.5% | 13.6% |
| Q4 25 | -446.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -195.2% | -953.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -258.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -342.9% | -6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -250.9% | -229.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -321.0% | -391.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -349.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -444.1% | -85.9% |
| Q4 25 | -428.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -188.1% | -1169.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -258.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -343.3% | 189.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -250.5% | -77.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -313.9% | -458.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -345.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -441.4% | -107.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.48 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.28 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.87 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.28 | $1.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.15 | $-11.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.07 | $-17.62 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.08 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.56 | $-116.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.6M | $12.0M |
| Total Assets | $12.8M | $16.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7M | $2.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | $504.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | $44.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $171.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.3M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $29.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $18.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6M | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | $12.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.6M | $16.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4M | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | $30.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $19.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4M | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.5M | $4.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.7M | $-1.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.7M | $-2.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -398.3% | -1318.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.1% | 353.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-5.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | $-606.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | $-976.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.8M | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.2M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.8M | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | -398.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -205.9% | -1318.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -191.5% | -822.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -328.5% | -635.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -246.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -296.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -354.2% | -1614.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -441.2% | -67.1% |
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 353.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.36× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
