vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SenesTech, Inc. (SNES) and LQR House Inc. (YHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SenesTech, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($421.0K vs $299.7K, roughly 1.4× LQR House Inc.). SenesTech, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -428.5% vs -1368.7%, a 940.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SenesTech, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-16.0% vs -64.2%). Over the past eight quarters, SenesTech, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (0.7% CAGR vs -21.1%).
SenesTech, Inc. is an agricultural biotechnology life-sciences company, specializing in fertility management as a form of pest control. The company's primary product, ContraPest is designed to make brown and black rats infertile. SenesTech is headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona.
LQR House Inc. is a US-based alcohol beverage e-commerce and distribution company. It offers a broad portfolio of spirits, wine, and beer, operating two core segments: direct-to-consumer retail for individuals and wholesale distribution for business clients across the United States.
SNES vs YHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $421.0K | $299.7K |
| Net Profit | $-1.8M | $-4.1M |
| Gross Margin | 55.3% | 17.8% |
| Operating Margin | -446.8% | -1000.3% |
| Net Margin | -428.5% | -1368.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -16.0% | -64.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -43.7% | 72.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.48 | $2.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $421.0K | $299.7K | ||
| Q3 25 | $690.0K | $337.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $625.0K | $498.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | $485.0K | $429.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | $501.0K | $838.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $482.0K | $624.5K | ||
| Q2 24 | $459.0K | $557.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | $415.0K | $481.1K |
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.3M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.6M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | $-14.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.5M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.8M | $-2.4M |
| Q4 25 | 55.3% | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 62.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.4% | 17.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 64.5% | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.9% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 65.4% | -9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.2% | -27.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.5% | -16.5% |
| Q4 25 | -446.8% | -1000.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -195.2% | -1134.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -258.2% | -442.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -342.9% | -559.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -250.9% | -1221.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -321.0% | -561.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -349.0% | -407.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -444.1% | -513.9% |
| Q4 25 | -428.5% | -1368.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -188.1% | -4989.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -258.6% | -441.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -343.3% | -556.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -250.5% | -1760.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -313.9% | -538.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -345.1% | -396.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -441.4% | -504.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.48 | $2.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.28 | $-1.50 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.87 | $-1.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.28 | $-3.85 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.15 | $-88.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.07 | $-21.84 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.08 | $-15.49 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.56 | $-18.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.6M | $29.3M |
| Total Assets | $12.8M | $31.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.2M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | $4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $9.6M | $29.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.3M | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $-518.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6M | $12.4M |
| Q4 25 | $12.8M | $31.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.6M | $35.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | $9.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $6.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4M | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.5M | $12.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.7M | $-14.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -398.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-5.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.7M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.8M | $-1.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.8M | $-1.4M |
| Q4 25 | -398.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -205.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -191.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -328.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -246.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -296.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -354.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -441.2% | -287.7% |
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 2.1% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.