vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) and WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC (WTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Snowflake Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $625.1M, roughly 1.9× WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 13.4% vs -24.2%, a 37.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Snowflake Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.7% vs 15.7%). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($140.3M vs $113.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Snowflake Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (25.1% CAGR vs 4.6%).
Snowflake Inc. is an American cloud-based data platform company founded in San Mateo, California, and headquartered in Bozeman, Montana. It operates a platform that supports data analysis and simultaneous access to data sets with minimal latency. It operates on Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform.
AERCO International, Inc. is a manufacturer and supplier of commercial condensing boilers, high efficiency water heating equipment and energy recovery systems in the HVAC/plumbing industry across a variety of markets including education, lodging, government, office buildings, healthcare, industrial and multifamily housing. In 1949, AERCO introduced the industry's first semi-instantaneous, tankless steam-to-water water heater. In 1988, AERCO introduced the first condensing and fully modulating...
SNOW vs WTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $625.1M |
| Net Profit | $-294.0M | $83.7M |
| Gross Margin | 67.8% | 49.5% |
| Operating Margin | -27.2% | 18.2% |
| Net Margin | -24.2% | 13.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.7% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.4% | 24.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.87 | $2.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $625.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $611.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $643.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $986.8M | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $942.1M | $540.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $868.8M | $543.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $828.7M | $597.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $774.7M | $570.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-294.0M | $83.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-298.0M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-430.1M | $100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-327.5M | $74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-324.3M | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-316.9M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-317.0M | $82.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-169.4M | $72.6M |
| Q4 25 | 67.8% | 49.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.5% | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 66.5% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.2% | 48.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 65.9% | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 66.8% | 47.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 67.1% | 47.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 68.8% | 46.9% |
| Q4 25 | -27.2% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -29.7% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -42.9% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -39.2% | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -38.8% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -40.9% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -42.1% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.6% | 16.9% |
| Q4 25 | -24.2% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -26.0% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -41.3% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -33.2% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -34.4% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -36.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -38.3% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.9% | 12.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.87 | $2.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.89 | $2.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.29 | $3.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.98 | $2.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.98 | $2.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.95 | $2.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.95 | $2.44 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.51 | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | $405.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.1B | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $8.2B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $405.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $457.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $369.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $336.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $386.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $303.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $279.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $237.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $8.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.2B | $2.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.5M | $154.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $113.6M | $140.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.4% | 22.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $776.7M | $356.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $137.5M | $154.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.9M | $122.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.4M | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $432.7M | $55.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.7M | $139.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.9M | $90.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $355.5M | $85.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $344.6M | $45.6M |
| Q4 25 | $113.6M | $140.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.2M | $110.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $183.4M | $59.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $421.4M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $88.3M | $127.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.8M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.9M | $78.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $331.5M | $35.5M |
| Q4 25 | 9.4% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.1% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.6% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.7% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.4% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.9% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.8% | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SNOW
| Products | $1.2B | 96% |
| Professional Services And Other | $54.5M | 4% |
| Related Party | $6.7M | 1% |
WTS
Segment breakdown not available.
