vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DNA X, Inc. (SONM) and UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES (UBFO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DNA X, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($16.2M vs $13.5M, roughly 1.2× UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES). UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES runs the higher net margin — 25.2% vs -29.3%, a 54.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.6% vs 7.9%). Over the past eight quarters, DNA X, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (9.9% CAGR vs 3.0%).
United Security Bancshares is a bank holding company headquartered in Fresno, California. It operates 11 branches.
SONM vs UBFO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $16.2M | $13.5M |
| Net Profit | $-4.8M | $3.4M |
| Gross Margin | 11.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -24.5% | 31.5% |
| Net Margin | -29.3% | 25.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.9% | 13.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -89.2% | 36.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-4.83 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.2M | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.2M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.7M | $13.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.3M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.0M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | $13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.1M | $12.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.5M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $458.0K | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.6M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.5M | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.6M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.9M | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -24.5% | 40.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -60.2% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 27.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.3% | 27.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.8% | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -56.2% | 46.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -29.5% | 45.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -29.3% | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -66.8% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 19.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -141.6% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.7% | 27.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -57.5% | 33.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -31.9% | 32.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.83 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.79 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.08 | $0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-116.99 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.32 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.41 | $0.25 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.65 | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.1M | $264.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-701.0K | $139.7M |
| Total Assets | $40.2M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $264.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1M | $211.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0M | $199.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $198.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $216.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $216.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6M | $166.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.3M | $168.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $139.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-701.0K | $137.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.3M | $134.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.1M | $132.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.7M | $130.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.3M | $132.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.5M | $127.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.8M | $124.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.4M | $1.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-7.0M | $22.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $19.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 146.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 16.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 6.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $36.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.0M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.9M | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.6M | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.5M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-417.0K | $5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-168.0K | $7.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $19.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.5M | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-554.0K | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-198.0K | $7.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 146.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 43.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 64.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.6% | 156.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.7% | 38.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.8% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.2% | 54.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.3% | 3.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | -20.97× | 1.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.87× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.79× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
