vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DNA X, Inc. (SONM) and UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST (UHT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($24.5M vs $16.2M, roughly 1.5× DNA X, Inc.). UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST runs the higher net margin — 17.7% vs -29.3%, a 47.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DNA X, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.9% vs -0.7%). Over the past eight quarters, DNA X, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (9.9% CAGR vs -1.3%).
Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) is an American Fortune 500 company that provides hospital and healthcare services, based in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. In 2024, UHS reported total revenues of $15.8 billion.
SONM vs UHT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $16.2M | $24.5M |
| Net Profit | $-4.8M | $4.3M |
| Gross Margin | 11.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -24.5% | 34.7% |
| Net Margin | -29.3% | 17.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.9% | -0.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -89.2% | -7.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-4.83 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $24.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.2M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.2M | $24.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.7M | $24.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.3M | $24.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.0M | $24.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.1M | $25.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.5M | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $458.0K | $4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.6M | $4.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.5M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.6M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.9M | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -24.5% | 33.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -60.2% | 35.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 36.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.3% | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.8% | 34.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -56.2% | 38.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -29.5% | 37.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -29.3% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -66.8% | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 19.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -141.6% | 18.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.7% | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -57.5% | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -31.9% | 21.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.83 | $0.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.79 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.08 | $0.34 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-116.99 | $0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.32 | $0.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.41 | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.65 | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.1M | $6.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1M | $374.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-701.0K | $152.4M |
| Total Assets | $40.2M | $564.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 2.46× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $6.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0M | $6.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.3M | $7.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $374.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $368.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $152.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-701.0K | $158.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.3M | $165.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.1M | $172.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.7M | $179.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.3M | $181.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.5M | $190.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.8M | $196.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $564.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.2M | $568.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.1M | $573.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.0M | $573.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.7M | $580.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.1M | $584.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.9M | $586.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.4M | $596.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-7.0M | $49.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 11.35× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $49.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.0M | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.9M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.6M | $11.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.5M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-417.0K | $9.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $12.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-168.0K | $11.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-554.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-198.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | -20.97× | 2.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SONM
Segment breakdown not available.
UHT
| Reportable Segment Aggregation Before Other Operating Segment | $23.1M | 94% |
| Equity Method Investment Nonconsolidated Investee Or Group Of Investees | $2.3M | 9% |
