vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SuperCom Ltd (SPCB) and STAK Inc. (STAK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SuperCom Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.2M vs $13.6M, roughly 1.0× STAK Inc.). SuperCom Ltd runs the higher net margin — 37.5% vs 11.9%, a 25.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. STAK Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.0M vs $-3.6M).
Super.com is a technology company headquartered in San Francisco and co-founded by Hussein Fazal and Henry Shi. The company provides financial services, including reward programs and travel bookings.
SPCB vs STAK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.2M | $13.6M |
| Net Profit | $5.3M | $1.6M |
| Gross Margin | 61.2% | 28.5% |
| Operating Margin | 16.3% | 13.6% |
| Net Margin | 37.5% | 11.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 79.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.32 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $14.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.4M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $14.1M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $6.3M | — |
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-5.2M | — |
| Q2 25 | 61.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.3% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 41.8% | — |
| Q2 25 | 16.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -12.2% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -49.9% | — |
| Q2 25 | 37.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.6% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -18.3% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -82.4% | — |
| Q2 25 | $1.32 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.19 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-10.66 | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-1.54 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.0M | $658.2K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $23.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $37.3M | $10.6M |
| Total Assets | $65.5M | $18.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $658.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $2.9M | — |
| Q2 25 | $23.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.2M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $32.9M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $32.3M | — |
| Q2 25 | $37.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.8M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $3.5M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $3.7M | — |
| Q2 25 | $65.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.6M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $40.8M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $42.7M | — |
| Q2 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.11× | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 9.49× | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 8.68× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.2M | $-998.6K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-3.6M | $-1.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -25.3% | -7.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.0% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.41× | -0.62× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-14.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-998.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-950.0K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-4.1M | — |
| Q2 25 | $-3.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-4.5M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-4.4M | — |
| Q2 25 | -25.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.8% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -31.5% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -70.4% | — |
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 4.4% | — |
| Q2 25 | -0.41× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.32× | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SPCB
Segment breakdown not available.
STAK
| Other | $4.2M | 31% |
| Sales of specialized oilfield equipment | $4.0M | 30% |
| Total | $3.3M | 24% |
| Sales of specialized oilfield vehicle | $2.1M | 15% |
| Service income from automation solutions | $26.4K | 0% |
