vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SuperCom Ltd (SPCB) and YORK WATER CO (YORW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
YORK WATER CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($19.4M vs $14.2M, roughly 1.4× SuperCom Ltd). SuperCom Ltd runs the higher net margin — 37.5% vs 26.7%, a 10.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, YORK WATER CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -1.5%).
Super.com is a technology company headquartered in San Francisco and co-founded by Hussein Fazal and Henry Shi. The company provides financial services, including reward programs and travel bookings.
The York Water Company is an investor-owned, public utility company based in York, Pennsylvania and operating throughout Pennsylvania. The company was founded in 1816 by a group of local businessmen concerned about fire protection.
SPCB vs YORW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.2M | $19.4M |
| Net Profit | $5.3M | $5.2M |
| Gross Margin | 61.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 16.3% | 33.2% |
| Net Margin | 37.5% | 26.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 79.5% | 0.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.32 | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $20.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.2M | $19.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.4M | $18.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 61.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 33.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.3% | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 34.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.7% | 37.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 35.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.5% | 26.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.6% | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 24.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.32 | $0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.19 | $0.35 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.0M | $1.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $23.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $37.3M | $240.3M |
| Total Assets | $65.5M | $680.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0M | $1.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7M | $1.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $240.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $238.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.3M | $234.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $232.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $231.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $228.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.8M | $225.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $222.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $680.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $667.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.5M | $653.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $641.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $633.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $621.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.6M | $610.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $602.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.11× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.2M | $8.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-3.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -25.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.41× | 1.63× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-14.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-950.0K | $6.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -25.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.41× | 1.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.32× | 1.34× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
