vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SuperCom Ltd (SPCB) and Zeo Energy Corp. (ZEO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Zeo Energy Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.6M vs $14.2M, roughly 1.3× SuperCom Ltd). SuperCom Ltd runs the higher net margin — 37.5% vs -10.8%, a 48.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Zeo Energy Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.4% vs -1.5%). Zeo Energy Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.3M vs $-3.6M).
Super.com is a technology company headquartered in San Francisco and co-founded by Hussein Fazal and Henry Shi. The company provides financial services, including reward programs and travel bookings.
SPCB vs ZEO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.2M | $18.6M |
| Net Profit | $5.3M | $-2.0M |
| Gross Margin | 61.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 16.3% | -11.8% |
| Net Margin | 37.5% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | -0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 79.5% | -360.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.32 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $23.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.2M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.4M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $20.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-435.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-424.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $-277.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 57.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 61.2% | 59.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 99.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 50.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.3% | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.3% | -15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -153.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.7% | -18.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -20.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -13.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.5% | -13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -72.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.6% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -7.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.32 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.48 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.19 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.54 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.0M | $6.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $23.6M | $79.1K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $37.3M | $5.3M |
| Total Assets | $65.5M | $56.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | 0.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0M | $68.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $79.1K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $84.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.6M | $642.8K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $715.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $787.7K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $858.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.2M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $748.8K |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.3M | $-59.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-23.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-88.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-39.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.8M | $-53.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-173.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $56.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $58.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.5M | $46.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $47.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $61.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $47.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.6M | $49.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $50.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.11× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.2M | $2.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-3.6M | $2.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -25.3% | 12.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.0% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.41× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-14.0M | $-9.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $162.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-950.0K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-10.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-6.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.6M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $116.5K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-10.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -28.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -25.3% | -15.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -30.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.8% | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -51.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.32× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SPCB
Segment breakdown not available.
ZEO
| Nonrelated Party | $18.1M | 98% |
| Related Party | $432.1K | 2% |
