vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Sprout Social, Inc. (SPT) and BRAND HOUSE COLLECTIVE, INC. (TBHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sprout Social, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($120.9M vs $103.5M, roughly 1.2× BRAND HOUSE COLLECTIVE, INC.). On growth, Sprout Social, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.9% vs -9.6%). Sprout Social, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($9.9M vs $-26.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Sprout Social, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.8% CAGR vs -21.0%).
Sprout Social, Inc. is a technology company that runs a social media management platform. A public company headquartered in Chicago, it was founded in 2010 by Justyn Howard, Aaron Rankin, Gil Lara, and Peter Soung.
Soho House is an international private members’ club with a focus on the media, arts and fashion industries.
SPT vs TBHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $120.9M | $103.5M |
| Net Profit | — | $-3.7M |
| Gross Margin | 77.6% | 20.4% |
| Operating Margin | -9.0% | -1.9% |
| Net Margin | — | -3.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.9% | -9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 51.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | $-0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $120.9M | $103.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.6M | $75.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.8M | $81.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $109.3M | $148.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $107.1M | $114.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.6M | $86.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.4M | $91.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $96.8M | $165.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.4M | $-20.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.0M | $-11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.2M | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-7.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-17.1M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.9M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-13.6M | $10.1M |
| Q4 25 | 77.6% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.7% | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 77.7% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 77.3% | 30.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 78.1% | 28.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 77.4% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 77.5% | 29.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 76.8% | 32.0% |
| Q4 25 | -9.0% | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.9% | -24.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.0% | -12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.2% | 6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.8% | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.4% | -15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.6% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.7% | 6.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.1% | -26.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.7% | -14.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.3% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.6% | -16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.0% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.0% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.18 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.16 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.21 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $-0.59 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.30 | $-1.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.30 | $-0.68 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.24 | $0.80 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $95.3M | $6.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $40.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $203.4M | $-44.0M |
| Total Assets | $523.1M | $229.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.20× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $95.3M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.6M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.5M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $100.9M | $3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $86.4M | $6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.9M | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.9M | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.2M | $3.8M |
| Q4 25 | $40.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $64.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.0M | $85.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $61.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $34.0M |
| Q4 25 | $203.4M | $-44.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $194.1M | $-35.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $184.6M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $175.3M | $-19.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.6M | $-27.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.1M | $-19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $152.1M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $147.3M | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | $523.1M | $229.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $481.4M | $221.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $422.9M | $225.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $424.7M | $242.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $428.3M | $279.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $388.8M | $266.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $393.6M | $242.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $389.9M | $250.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.88× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $10.9M | $-25.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.9M | $-26.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.2% | -25.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $39.3M | $-18.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.9M | $-25.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.3M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.1M | $19.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $-12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | $-12.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.2M | $28.2M |
| Q4 25 | $9.9M | $-26.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.7M | $19.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5M | $-13.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $-14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.1M | $26.7M |
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | -25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | -4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | -11.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | -15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | -15.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.4% | 16.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.51× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.79× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
